1992RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Dual and multiple exchange rate systems in developing countries : some empirical evidence

Nita Ghei

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The authors examine the determinants of the parallel exchange rate for a cross-country sample of developing countries. The sample includes countries in which the parallel exchange rate is official (dual exchange rate systems) as well as those in which it is unofficial (black market). They base their empirical analysis on a portfolio macroeconomic model in which the parallel exchange rate is determined by expectations and equilibrium asset considerations in the short run, but depends on the evolution of key policy variables (such as stock of money, budget deficits, and trade policy) in the long run. The results indicate that macroeconomic variables explain more than 70 percent of the variation in the spread between the official and parallel exchange rates. The authors cannot reject the hypothesis that there are no differences in the determinants of the spread when the parallel rate is official and unofficial. Also, they cannot reject the hypothesis that restrictions on the capital account affect the spread. These results are consistent with prior findings that portfolio considerations dominate the determination of the parallel rate in the short run. There is evidence that the adoption of dual exchange rate systems only partly insulates domestic prices. This insulation may be limited by : 1) a leakage of transactions from the official to the parallel market; and 2) depreciation of the parallel exchange rate.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors examine the determinants of the parallel exchange rate for a cross-country sample of developing countries. The sample includes countries in which the parallel exchange rate is official (dual exchange rate systems) as well as those in which it is unofficial (black market). They base their empirical analysis on a portfolio macroeconomic model in which the parallel exchange rate is determined by expectations and equilibrium asset considerations in the short run, but depends on the evolution of key policy variables (such as stock of money, budget deficits, and trade policy) in the long run. The results indicate that macroeconomic variables explain more than 70 percent of the variation in the spread between the official and parallel exchange rates. The authors cannot reject the hypothesis that there are no differences in the determinants of the spread when the parallel rate is official and unofficial. Also, they cannot reject the hypothesis that restrictions on the capital account affect the spread. These results are consistent with prior findings that portfolio considerations dominate the determination of the parallel rate in the short run. There is evidence that the adoption of dual exchange rate systems only partly insulates domestic prices. This insulation may be limited by : 1) a leakage of transactions from the official to the parallel market; and 2) depreciation of the parallel exchange rate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors examine the determinants of the parallel exchange rate for a cross-country sample of developing countries. The sample includes countries in which the parallel exchange rate is official (dual exchange rate systems) as well as those in which it is unofficial (black market). They base their empirical analysis on a portfolio macroeconomic model in which the parallel exchange rate is determined by expectations and equilibrium asset considerations in the short run, but depends on the evolution of key policy variables (such as stock of money, budget deficits, and trade policy) in the long run. The results indicate that macroeconomic variables explain more than 70 percent of the variation in the spread between the official and parallel exchange rates. The authors cannot reject the hypothesis that there are no differences in the determinants of the spread when the parallel rate is official and unofficial. Also, they cannot reject the hypothesis that restrictions on the capital account affect the spread. These results are consistent with prior findings that portfolio considerations dominate the determination of the parallel rate in the short run. There is evidence that the adoption of dual exchange rate systems only partly insulates domestic prices. This insulation may be limited by : 1) a leakage of transactions from the official to the parallel market; and 2) depreciation of the parallel exchange rate.

Key concepts: Exchange rate, Economics, Portfolio, Monetary economics, Dual (grammatical number), Depreciation (economics), Stock exchange, Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dual and multiple exchange rate systems in developing countries : some empirical evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens