1997•Minnesota law reviewOpen access

Is the Supreme Court Irrelevant--Reflections on the Judicial Role in Environmental Law

Daniel A. Farber

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Federal environmental law is over a quarter century old, dating from the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 and the Clean Air Act (CAA) 2 in 1970.Since then, the Supreme Court has decided roughly two or three environmental law cases per year-or somewhere between fifty and one hundred cases altogether.3 To assess the Court's relevance, imagine that all those cases were wiped off the books.If the Court had never granted certiorari in a single environmental case, would the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal agencies operate any differently?Would firms be subject to different federal regulations?In short, how different would environmental protection be today?The answer, according to my thesis, is "not much."During the past twenty years, the Court's decisions have not substan-

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Federal environmental law is over a quarter century old, dating from the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 and the Clean Air Act (CAA) 2 in 1970.Since then, the Supreme Court has decided roughly two or three environmental law cases per year-or somewhere between fifty and one hundred cases altogether.3 To assess the Court's relevance, imagine that all those cases were wiped off the books.If the Court had never granted certiorari in a single environmental case, would the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal agencies operate any differently?Would firms be subject to different federal regulations?In short, how different would environmental protection be today?The answer, according to my thesis, is "not much."During the past twenty years, the Court's decisions have not substan-

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Federal environmental law is over a quarter century old, dating from the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 and the Clean Air Act (CAA) 2 in 1970.Since then, the Supreme Court has decided roughly two or three environmental law cases per year-or somewhere between fifty and one hundred cases altogether.3 To assess the Court's relevance, imagine that all those cases were wiped off the books.If the Court had never granted certiorari in a single environmental case, would the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal agencies operate any differently?Would firms be subject to different federal regulations?In short, how different would environmental protection be today?The answer, according to my thesis, is "not much."During the past twenty years, the Court's decisions have not substan-

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Environmental law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the Supreme Court Irrelevant--Reflections on the Judicial Role in Environmental Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens