Is the Supreme Court Irrelevant--Reflections on the Judicial Role in Environmental Law
Daniel A. Farber
Abstract
Open-access reader
Daniel A. Farber
Abstract
Open-access reader
Federal environmental law is over a quarter century old, dating from the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 and the Clean Air Act (CAA) 2 in 1970.Since then, the Supreme Court has decided roughly two or three environmental law cases per year-or somewhere between fifty and one hundred cases altogether.3 To assess the Court's relevance, imagine that all those cases were wiped off the books.If the Court had never granted certiorari in a single environmental case, would the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal agencies operate any differently?Would firms be subject to different federal regulations?In short, how different would environmental protection be today?The answer, according to my thesis, is "not much."During the past twenty years, the Court's decisions have not substan-
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Federal environmental law is over a quarter century old, dating from the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 and the Clean Air Act (CAA) 2 in 1970.Since then, the Supreme Court has decided roughly two or three environmental law cases per year-or somewhere between fifty and one hundred cases altogether.3 To assess the Court's relevance, imagine that all those cases were wiped off the books.If the Court had never granted certiorari in a single environmental case, would the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other federal agencies operate any differently?Would firms be subject to different federal regulations?In short, how different would environmental protection be today?The answer, according to my thesis, is "not much."During the past twenty years, the Court's decisions have not substan-
Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Environmental law