2012PubMedRequires access

[The impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the surgery of cervical cancer patients].

Yavor Kornovski, E Ismail

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRHT) stage by stage in cervical cancer and its impact on the blood loss, the duration of RH as well as on bladder dysfunction in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. MATERIAL (PATIENTS): Between XI.2002 and IX.2011 294 consecutive patients with invasive cervical cancer (IB1, IB2, IIB) were operated on. The performed surgery was radical hysterectomy class III and pelvic lymphadenectomy 77 patients were submitted to NSRH (26.19%)--56 patients--non-irradiated (gr. 1) and 21--after preoperative radiotherapy (gr.2) CONCLUSIONS: NSRH is feasible technique in stages IB1, I82, IIB before or after radiotherapy. NSRH doesn't compromise the radically of the RH. Preoperative radiotherapy doesn't change the benefits of NSRH. The latter is associated with minimal blood loss during RH (280 ml vs 600, p < 0.005), fast recovery to spontaneous voiding (16th day vs 24, p < 0.005) and is little more time--consumpting procedure (75 min. vs 60 min., NS).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRHT) stage by stage in cervical cancer and its impact on the blood loss, the duration of RH as well as on bladder dysfunction in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. MATERIAL (PATIENTS): Between XI.2002 and IX.2011 294 consecutive patients with invasive cervical cancer (IB1, IB2, IIB) were operated on. The performed surgery was radical hysterectomy class III and pelvic lymphadenectomy 77 patients were submitted to NSRH (26.19%)--56 patients--non-irradiated (gr. 1) and 21--after preoperative radiotherapy (gr.2) CONCLUSIONS: NSRH is feasible technique in stages IB1, I82, IIB before or after radiotherapy. NSRH doesn't compromise the radically of the RH. Preoperative radiotherapy doesn't change the benefits of NSRH. The latter is associated with minimal blood loss during RH (280 ml vs 600, p < 0.005), fast recovery to spontaneous voiding (16th day vs 24, p < 0.005) and is little more time--consumpting procedure (75 min. vs 60 min., NS).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRHT) stage by stage in cervical cancer and its impact on the blood loss, the duration of RH as well as on bladder dysfunction in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. MATERIAL (PATIENTS): Between XI.2002 and IX.2011 294 consecutive patients with invasive cervical cancer (IB1, IB2, IIB) were operated on. The performed surgery was radical hysterectomy class III and pelvic lymphadenectomy 77 patients were submitted to NSRH (26.19%)--56 patients--non-irradiated (gr. 1) and 21--after preoperative radiotherapy (gr.2) CONCLUSIONS: NSRH is feasible technique in stages IB1, I82, IIB before or after radiotherapy. NSRH doesn't compromise the radically of the RH. Preoperative radiotherapy doesn't change the benefits of NSRH. The latter is associated with minimal blood loss during RH (280 ml vs 600, p < 0.005), fast recovery to spontaneous voiding (16th day vs 24, p < 0.005) and is little more time--consumpting procedure (75 min. vs 60 min., NS).

Key concepts: Radical Hysterectomy, Medicine, Cervical cancer, Nerve sparing, Blood loss, Radiation therapy, Urology, Stage (stratigraphy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the surgery of cervical cancer patients]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens