2010•The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

Removal of Covered Class Actions Under SLUSA: The Failure of Plain Meaning and Legislative Intent as Interpretative Devices, and the Supreme Court's Decisive Solution

J. Tyler Butts

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Legislature, Meaning (existential), Class (philosophy), Law, Political science, Philosophy, Epistemology

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

Removal of Covered Class Actions Under SLUSA: The Failure of Plain Meaning and Legislative Intent as Interpretative Devices, and the Supreme Court's Decisive Solution — Research Paper | ScholarLens