VI. Conclusion Part B
Michael Siegrist
Abstract
Michael Siegrist
Abstract
Two arguments are commonly brought forward to call into question the application of provisions relative to occupied territories in accordance with the functional beginning of belligerent occupation. First, it is often contended that the functional beginning of belligerent occupation theory would not be necessary because a strict distinction between invasion and a state of belligerent occupation does not create a gap in protection. The existing rules alongside those on
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two arguments are commonly brought forward to call into question the application of provisions relative to occupied territories in accordance with the functional beginning of belligerent occupation. First, it is often contended that the functional beginning of belligerent occupation theory would not be necessary because a strict distinction between invasion and a state of belligerent occupation does not create a gap in protection. The existing rules alongside those on
Key concepts: Belligerent, State (computer science), Political science, Law, Computer science, Politics, Algorithm