2011Unpublished venueRequires access

How the Courts Have Changed the Patent Law

Alexander I. Poltorak, Paul J. Lerner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The patent law statutes may be amended only rarely, but practically speaking, patent law changes fairly often as a result of court decisions in major patent infringement cases. This chapter discusses several key court decisions and their effect on patent law. For example, the famous Bilski case concerned whether business methods should be patentable but also had broader implications for software patents. Other examples of lawsuits that changed patent law include eBay, which raised the question of whether a nonpracticing entity (NPE) has the right to a permanent injunction after prevailing in a patent trial; Seagate, which made it more difficult to obtain a finding of willful infringement in a patent suit; and KSR, which raised the question of how to determine whether a patent is obvious.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The patent law statutes may be amended only rarely, but practically speaking, patent law changes fairly often as a result of court decisions in major patent infringement cases. This chapter discusses several key court decisions and their effect on patent law. For example, the famous Bilski case concerned whether business methods should be patentable but also had broader implications for software patents. Other examples of lawsuits that changed patent law include eBay, which raised the question of whether a nonpracticing entity (NPE) has the right to a permanent injunction after prevailing in a patent trial; Seagate, which made it more difficult to obtain a finding of willful infringement in a patent suit; and KSR, which raised the question of how to determine whether a patent is obvious.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The patent law statutes may be amended only rarely, but practically speaking, patent law changes fairly often as a result of court decisions in major patent infringement cases. This chapter discusses several key court decisions and their effect on patent law. For example, the famous Bilski case concerned whether business methods should be patentable but also had broader implications for software patents. Other examples of lawsuits that changed patent law include eBay, which raised the question of whether a nonpracticing entity (NPE) has the right to a permanent injunction after prevailing in a patent trial; Seagate, which made it more difficult to obtain a finding of willful infringement in a patent suit; and KSR, which raised the question of how to determine whether a patent is obvious.

Key concepts: Patent law, Patent infringement, Patent troll, Statute, Law, Supreme court, Patentable subject matter, Patent Act

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How the Courts Have Changed the Patent Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens