1983OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Open access

PWR shutdown decay-heat removal analyses in support of TAP A-45. [Feed and bleed]

B.E. Boyack, R.J. Henninger, Ron C. Smith

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The US NRC currently considers the adequacy of shutdown decay heat removal to be an unresolved safety issue (USI A-45). The purpose of Task Action Plan (TAP) A-45 is to evaluate the adequacy of current licensing design requirements, to ensure that nuclear power plants do not pose an unacceptable risk because of failure to remove shutdown decay heat. A major part of TAP A-45 is concerned with the transition from reactor trip to hot shutdown. Also of interest is the transition from hot shutdown to cold shutdown and maintaining cold shutdown conditions. Although a limited number of alternative means for removal of shutdown decay heat from PWRs are being examined by the NRC, this paper focuses on the application of the feed and bleed concept as a diverse alternative method of removing decay heat that does not rely on the use of the steam generators.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The US NRC currently considers the adequacy of shutdown decay heat removal to be an unresolved safety issue (USI A-45). The purpose of Task Action Plan (TAP) A-45 is to evaluate the adequacy of current licensing design requirements, to ensure that nuclear power plants do not pose an unacceptable risk because of failure to remove shutdown decay heat. A major part of TAP A-45 is concerned with the transition from reactor trip to hot shutdown. Also of interest is the transition from hot shutdown to cold shutdown and maintaining cold shutdown conditions. Although a limited number of alternative means for removal of shutdown decay heat from PWRs are being examined by the NRC, this paper focuses on the application of the feed and bleed concept as a diverse alternative method of removing decay heat that does not rely on the use of the steam generators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The US NRC currently considers the adequacy of shutdown decay heat removal to be an unresolved safety issue (USI A-45). The purpose of Task Action Plan (TAP) A-45 is to evaluate the adequacy of current licensing design requirements, to ensure that nuclear power plants do not pose an unacceptable risk because of failure to remove shutdown decay heat. A major part of TAP A-45 is concerned with the transition from reactor trip to hot shutdown. Also of interest is the transition from hot shutdown to cold shutdown and maintaining cold shutdown conditions. Although a limited number of alternative means for removal of shutdown decay heat from PWRs are being examined by the NRC, this paper focuses on the application of the feed and bleed concept as a diverse alternative method of removing decay heat that does not rely on the use of the steam generators.

Key concepts: Shutdown, Decay heat, Nuclear engineering, Reliability engineering, Environmental science, Nuclear power, Engineering, Waste management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PWR shutdown decay-heat removal analyses in support of TAP A-45. [Feed and bleed] — Research Paper | ScholarLens