2010Principles of Knowledge Representation and ReasoningRequires access

From justifications towards proofs for ontology engineering

Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Justifications are currently the dominant form of explanation provided by ontology engineering environments, especially those focused on the Web Ontology Language (OWL). However, justifications for entailments in real ontologies can be very difficult or impossible for a wide range of people to understand. In essence, justifications are merely the premises of a proof and, as such, do not articulate the, often non-obvious, reasoning which connect those premises with the conclusion. This paper looks at moving towards proofs to solve this problem. Since there are many naturally occurring justifications that people can understand, the ultimate goal is to create justification oriented proofs. The foundation of these proofs is justification lemmatisation, which is presented in this paper.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Justifications are currently the dominant form of explanation provided by ontology engineering environments, especially those focused on the Web Ontology Language (OWL). However, justifications for entailments in real ontologies can be very difficult or impossible for a wide range of people to understand. In essence, justifications are merely the premises of a proof and, as such, do not articulate the, often non-obvious, reasoning which connect those premises with the conclusion. This paper looks at moving towards proofs to solve this problem. Since there are many naturally occurring justifications that people can understand, the ultimate goal is to create justification oriented proofs. The foundation of these proofs is justification lemmatisation, which is presented in this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Justifications are currently the dominant form of explanation provided by ontology engineering environments, especially those focused on the Web Ontology Language (OWL). However, justifications for entailments in real ontologies can be very difficult or impossible for a wide range of people to understand. In essence, justifications are merely the premises of a proof and, as such, do not articulate the, often non-obvious, reasoning which connect those premises with the conclusion. This paper looks at moving towards proofs to solve this problem. Since there are many naturally occurring justifications that people can understand, the ultimate goal is to create justification oriented proofs. The foundation of these proofs is justification lemmatisation, which is presented in this paper.

Key concepts: Mathematical proof, Ontology, Computer science, Foundation (evidence), Ontology engineering, Upper ontology, Epistemology, Semantic Web

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From justifications towards proofs for ontology engineering — Research Paper | ScholarLens