Tax Implications of Welfare Reform: The Minnesota Experience
Paul Wilson
Abstract
Paul Wilson
Abstract
Partly in response to welfare reform, an increasing number of states have enacted refundable tax credits to assist low-income working families. These state credits are layered on top of the federal tax system, state welfare programs, and direct state subsidies for child care. Minnesota's experience shows how state earned income credits might be redesigned to better meet their goals. It also illustrates how difficult it is to integrate a refundable state child care credit with the non-refundable federal credit, pretax accounts, and direct subsidies for child care.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Partly in response to welfare reform, an increasing number of states have enacted refundable tax credits to assist low-income working families. These state credits are layered on top of the federal tax system, state welfare programs, and direct state subsidies for child care. Minnesota's experience shows how state earned income credits might be redesigned to better meet their goals. It also illustrates how difficult it is to integrate a refundable state child care credit with the non-refundable federal credit, pretax accounts, and direct subsidies for child care.
Key concepts: Subsidy, Tax credit, Public economics, Tax reform, Welfare reform, State (computer science), Earned income tax credit, Welfare