2000National Tax JournalOpen access

Tax Implications of Welfare Reform: The Minnesota Experience

Paul Wilson

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Partly in response to welfare reform, an increasing number of states have enacted refundable tax credits to assist low-income working families. These state credits are layered on top of the federal tax system, state welfare programs, and direct state subsidies for child care. Minnesota's experience shows how state earned income credits might be redesigned to better meet their goals. It also illustrates how difficult it is to integrate a refundable state child care credit with the non-refundable federal credit, pretax accounts, and direct subsidies for child care.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Partly in response to welfare reform, an increasing number of states have enacted refundable tax credits to assist low-income working families. These state credits are layered on top of the federal tax system, state welfare programs, and direct state subsidies for child care. Minnesota's experience shows how state earned income credits might be redesigned to better meet their goals. It also illustrates how difficult it is to integrate a refundable state child care credit with the non-refundable federal credit, pretax accounts, and direct subsidies for child care.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Partly in response to welfare reform, an increasing number of states have enacted refundable tax credits to assist low-income working families. These state credits are layered on top of the federal tax system, state welfare programs, and direct state subsidies for child care. Minnesota's experience shows how state earned income credits might be redesigned to better meet their goals. It also illustrates how difficult it is to integrate a refundable state child care credit with the non-refundable federal credit, pretax accounts, and direct subsidies for child care.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Tax credit, Public economics, Tax reform, Welfare reform, State (computer science), Earned income tax credit, Welfare

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tax Implications of Welfare Reform: The Minnesota Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens