1995˜The œfortnightly reviewRequires access

CPUC chooses reregulation over deregulation

C.M. Studness

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) moved a tortured step closer to deciding how it will reform its regulation of the state`s electric utilities when it adopted a Proposed Policy Decision in its proceeding on competition by a 3-to-1 vote on May 24. The Proposed Decision retreats from the free-market approach the CPUC took when it presented its `Blue Book` proposal in April 1994. Indeed, the Proposed Decision amounts to a tacit admission that the CPUC cannot accomplish the task of implementing competition, and begins a transfer of the task from regulators to legislatures. Competition will, thus, evolve more slowly than if the CPUC had followed the course envisioned by the Blue Book; however, the delay is unlikely to have much effect on the ultimate emergence of competition, which is driven by technological and economic forces beyond the control of regulators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) moved a tortured step closer to deciding how it will reform its regulation of the state`s electric utilities when it adopted a Proposed Policy Decision in its proceeding on competition by a 3-to-1 vote on May 24. The Proposed Decision retreats from the free-market approach the CPUC took when it presented its `Blue Book` proposal in April 1994. Indeed, the Proposed Decision amounts to a tacit admission that the CPUC cannot accomplish the task of implementing competition, and begins a transfer of the task from regulators to legislatures. Competition will, thus, evolve more slowly than if the CPUC had followed the course envisioned by the Blue Book; however, the delay is unlikely to have much effect on the ultimate emergence of competition, which is driven by technological and economic forces beyond the control of regulators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) moved a tortured step closer to deciding how it will reform its regulation of the state`s electric utilities when it adopted a Proposed Policy Decision in its proceeding on competition by a 3-to-1 vote on May 24. The Proposed Decision retreats from the free-market approach the CPUC took when it presented its `Blue Book` proposal in April 1994. Indeed, the Proposed Decision amounts to a tacit admission that the CPUC cannot accomplish the task of implementing competition, and begins a transfer of the task from regulators to legislatures. Competition will, thus, evolve more slowly than if the CPUC had followed the course envisioned by the Blue Book; however, the delay is unlikely to have much effect on the ultimate emergence of competition, which is driven by technological and economic forces beyond the control of regulators.

Key concepts: Deregulation, Competition (biology), Legislature, Task (project management), Economics, Commission, Tacit collusion, Control (management)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CPUC chooses reregulation over deregulation — Research Paper | ScholarLens