Anger management and violence prevention : improving effectiveness
Kevin Howells, Andrew Day, Susan Bubner, Susan Jauncey, Paul Williamson, Ann L. Parker, Karen Heseltine
Abstract
Kevin Howells, Andrew Day, Susan Bubner, Susan Jauncey, Paul Williamson, Ann L. Parker, Karen Heseltine
Abstract
After reviewing the findings of previous studies of anger management programs, this paper discusses the findings of a study of 200 male offenders (mainly prisoners) in South Australia and Western Australia before and after they participated in an anger management intervention. The study found that the overall impact of the anger management interventions was small and no significant differences were observed for community versus prison participants. The paper discusses the question of who benefits most from anger management programs, concluding that those high in anger and low in anger control at the outset, and those who were motivated to work on their anger problems, showed greater improvement on a wide range of anger measures. The paper also discusses the reasons for the low impact of offender anger management programs, and makes recommendations for improving anger management outcomes.
OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
After reviewing the findings of previous studies of anger management programs, this paper discusses the findings of a study of 200 male offenders (mainly prisoners) in South Australia and Western Australia before and after they participated in an anger management intervention. The study found that the overall impact of the anger management interventions was small and no significant differences were observed for community versus prison participants. The paper discusses the question of who benefits most from anger management programs, concluding that those high in anger and low in anger control at the outset, and those who were motivated to work on their anger problems, showed greater improvement on a wide range of anger measures. The paper also discusses the reasons for the low impact of offender anger management programs, and makes recommendations for improving anger management outcomes.
Key concepts: Anger, Anger management, Prison, Psychological intervention, Psychology, Clinical psychology, Poison control, Human factors and ergonomics