Freedom of Choice in Macroeconomic Forecasting: An Illustration with German Industrial Production and Linear Models
Nikolay Robinzonov, Klaus Wohlrabe
Abstract
Open-access reader
Nikolay Robinzonov, Klaus Wohlrabe
Abstract
Open-access reader
Different studies provide surprisingly a large variety of controversial conclusions aboutthe forecasting power of an indicator, even when it is supposed to forecast the sametime series. In this study we aim to provide a thorough overview of linear forecastingtechniques and draw conclusions useful for the identification of the predictive relationshipbetween leading indicators and time series. In a case study for Germany we forecastfour possible representations of industrial production. Further on we consider alarge variety of time-varying specifications: ex post vs. ex ante, rolling vs. recursive andmodel specifications such as restricted vs. unrestricted, AIC vs. BIC vs. OSC, direct vs.indirect. In a horse race with nine leading indicators plus benchmark we demonstrate thevariance of assessment across target variables and forecasting settings (50 per horizon).We show that it is nearly always possible to find situations in which one indicatorproved to have better predicting power compared to another.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Different studies provide surprisingly a large variety of controversial conclusions aboutthe forecasting power of an indicator, even when it is supposed to forecast the sametime series. In this study we aim to provide a thorough overview of linear forecastingtechniques and draw conclusions useful for the identification of the predictive relationshipbetween leading indicators and time series. In a case study for Germany we forecastfour possible representations of industrial production. Further on we consider alarge variety of time-varying specifications: ex post vs. ex ante, rolling vs. recursive andmodel specifications such as restricted vs. unrestricted, AIC vs. BIC vs. OSC, direct vs.indirect. In a horse race with nine leading indicators plus benchmark we demonstrate thevariance of assessment across target variables and forecasting settings (50 per horizon).We show that it is nearly always possible to find situations in which one indicatorproved to have better predicting power compared to another.
Key concepts: Predictive power, Econometrics, Benchmark (surveying), Industrial production, Variety (cybernetics), Ex-ante, Production (economics), Variance (accounting)