2015bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Effective Appellate Advocacy before the Federal Circuit: A Former Law Clerk's Perspective

Rachel Clark Hughey

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

I first learned to appreciate the difference between effective and ineffective appellate advocacy while clerking for the Federal Circuit.In the hundreds of cases in which I read and analyzed briefs and observed oral argument during my year as a clerk, I saw lawyers who were well-prepared and effective and lawyers who were not.Indeed, I came to realize that the ineffective attorneys often made the same mistakes,' and that their mistakes would have been easy to remedy had the lawyers only realized they were making them.To that end, this article reviews some of the common mistakes that attorneys make before the Federal Circuit and * Attorney, Merchant & Gould, P.C., Minneapolis; clerk for the Honorable Alvin A. Schall of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2005-2006.The opinions expressed in this article are solely my own.I would nonetheless like to express my gratitude to Judge Schall,

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I first learned to appreciate the difference between effective and ineffective appellate advocacy while clerking for the Federal Circuit.In the hundreds of cases in which I read and analyzed briefs and observed oral argument during my year as a clerk, I saw lawyers who were well-prepared and effective and lawyers who were not.Indeed, I came to realize that the ineffective attorneys often made the same mistakes,' and that their mistakes would have been easy to remedy had the lawyers only realized they were making them.To that end, this article reviews some of the common mistakes that attorneys make before the Federal Circuit and * Attorney, Merchant & Gould, P.C., Minneapolis; clerk for the Honorable Alvin A. Schall of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2005-2006.The opinions expressed in this article are solely my own.I would nonetheless like to express my gratitude to Judge Schall,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I first learned to appreciate the difference between effective and ineffective appellate advocacy while clerking for the Federal Circuit.In the hundreds of cases in which I read and analyzed briefs and observed oral argument during my year as a clerk, I saw lawyers who were well-prepared and effective and lawyers who were not.Indeed, I came to realize that the ineffective attorneys often made the same mistakes,' and that their mistakes would have been easy to remedy had the lawyers only realized they were making them.To that end, this article reviews some of the common mistakes that attorneys make before the Federal Circuit and * Attorney, Merchant & Gould, P.C., Minneapolis; clerk for the Honorable Alvin A. Schall of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2005-2006.The opinions expressed in this article are solely my own.I would nonetheless like to express my gratitude to Judge Schall,

Key concepts: Law, Argument (complex analysis), Supreme court, Political science, Sociology, Chemistry, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effective Appellate Advocacy before the Federal Circuit: A Former Law Clerk's Perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens