1991bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Labor and Employment Discrimination Cases in the Supreme Court 1989 Term

Julia C. Lamber, Terry A. Bethel

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

We are grateful for the research assistance of Janet McInnis.1. Perhaps the most noted case we omit is Rutan v. Republican Party, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990), in which the Court found, by a five to four vote, that the first amendment bars public employers from basing decisions to hire, promote, transfer, or recall low level employees on political affiliation.Other cases include Pension Benefit Guar.Corp. v. LTV Corp., 110 S. Ct. (1990) (upholding involuntary post-termination restoration of an ERISA-covered pension plan imposed by the Pension Benefit

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We are grateful for the research assistance of Janet McInnis.1. Perhaps the most noted case we omit is Rutan v. Republican Party, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990), in which the Court found, by a five to four vote, that the first amendment bars public employers from basing decisions to hire, promote, transfer, or recall low level employees on political affiliation.Other cases include Pension Benefit Guar.Corp. v. LTV Corp., 110 S. Ct. (1990) (upholding involuntary post-termination restoration of an ERISA-covered pension plan imposed by the Pension Benefit

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We are grateful for the research assistance of Janet McInnis.1. Perhaps the most noted case we omit is Rutan v. Republican Party, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990), in which the Court found, by a five to four vote, that the first amendment bars public employers from basing decisions to hire, promote, transfer, or recall low level employees on political affiliation.Other cases include Pension Benefit Guar.Corp. v. LTV Corp., 110 S. Ct. (1990) (upholding involuntary post-termination restoration of an ERISA-covered pension plan imposed by the Pension Benefit

Key concepts: Supreme court, Term (time), Political science, Law, Labour law, Physics, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Labor and Employment Discrimination Cases in the Supreme Court 1989 Term — Research Paper | ScholarLens