Labor and Employment Discrimination Cases in the Supreme Court 1989 Term
Julia C. Lamber, Terry A. Bethel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Julia C. Lamber, Terry A. Bethel
Abstract
Open-access reader
We are grateful for the research assistance of Janet McInnis.1. Perhaps the most noted case we omit is Rutan v. Republican Party, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990), in which the Court found, by a five to four vote, that the first amendment bars public employers from basing decisions to hire, promote, transfer, or recall low level employees on political affiliation.Other cases include Pension Benefit Guar.Corp. v. LTV Corp., 110 S. Ct. (1990) (upholding involuntary post-termination restoration of an ERISA-covered pension plan imposed by the Pension Benefit
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We are grateful for the research assistance of Janet McInnis.1. Perhaps the most noted case we omit is Rutan v. Republican Party, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990), in which the Court found, by a five to four vote, that the first amendment bars public employers from basing decisions to hire, promote, transfer, or recall low level employees on political affiliation.Other cases include Pension Benefit Guar.Corp. v. LTV Corp., 110 S. Ct. (1990) (upholding involuntary post-termination restoration of an ERISA-covered pension plan imposed by the Pension Benefit
Key concepts: Supreme court, Term (time), Political science, Law, Labour law, Physics, Quantum mechanics