1989Unpublished venueOpen access

Environmental, health, and safety concerns associated with nonpetroleum fuel use in US transportation

Jyotishma Rajan, C L Saricks, Monica Singh, W.J. Walsh

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

This report qualitatively examines the environmental, health, and safety concerns associated with the use of three alternative fuels in the US transportation system: methanol, compressed natural gas, and electricity. For each of these fuels, this report presents the results of a literature review, discussions with specialists, and recent data from in-use fleet tests and summarizes the state of knowledge of their potential air pollution contribution from end use and process emissions relative to gasoline and diesel fuels. Carbon monoxide, particulate matter, ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen and volatile organics), and carbon dioxide (from processing activities) are emphasized. Methanol-fueled vehicles are expected to have emissions comparable to their gasoline counterparts at least during the initial years, albeit with higher emissions of formaldehyde. Methanol production from coal may result in higher emissions of carbon dioxide. Compressed natural gas vehicles have the potential to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and nonmethane hydrocarbons relative to conventional fuels. Electric vehicles using recharge power from nuclear or renewable energy sources hold the greatest promise for reduced air emissions. The manufacture and disposal of materials from lead-acid and nickel-iron batteries present safety concerns related to the potential emission of toxic materials. 69 refs., 7 figs., 8 tabs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report qualitatively examines the environmental, health, and safety concerns associated with the use of three alternative fuels in the US transportation system: methanol, compressed natural gas, and electricity. For each of these fuels, this report presents the results of a literature review, discussions with specialists, and recent data from in-use fleet tests and summarizes the state of knowledge of their potential air pollution contribution from end use and process emissions relative to gasoline and diesel fuels. Carbon monoxide, particulate matter, ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen and volatile organics), and carbon dioxide (from processing activities) are emphasized. Methanol-fueled vehicles are expected to have emissions comparable to their gasoline counterparts at least during the initial years, albeit with higher emissions of formaldehyde. Methanol production from coal may result in higher emissions of carbon dioxide. Compressed natural gas vehicles have the potential to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and nonmethane hydrocarbons relative to conventional fuels. Electric vehicles using recharge power from nuclear or renewable energy sources hold the greatest promise for reduced air emissions. The manufacture and disposal of materials from lead-acid and nickel-iron batteries present safety concerns related to the potential emission of toxic materials. 69 refs., 7 figs., 8 tabs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report qualitatively examines the environmental, health, and safety concerns associated with the use of three alternative fuels in the US transportation system: methanol, compressed natural gas, and electricity. For each of these fuels, this report presents the results of a literature review, discussions with specialists, and recent data from in-use fleet tests and summarizes the state of knowledge of their potential air pollution contribution from end use and process emissions relative to gasoline and diesel fuels. Carbon monoxide, particulate matter, ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen and volatile organics), and carbon dioxide (from processing activities) are emphasized. Methanol-fueled vehicles are expected to have emissions comparable to their gasoline counterparts at least during the initial years, albeit with higher emissions of formaldehyde. Methanol production from coal may result in higher emissions of carbon dioxide. Compressed natural gas vehicles have the potential to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and nonmethane hydrocarbons relative to conventional fuels. Electric vehicles using recharge power from nuclear or renewable energy sources hold the greatest promise for reduced air emissions. The manufacture and disposal of materials from lead-acid and nickel-iron batteries present safety concerns related to the potential emission of toxic materials. 69 refs., 7 figs., 8 tabs.

Key concepts: Waste management, Compressed natural gas, Gasoline, Environmental science, Air pollution, Fossil fuel, Carbon-neutral fuel, Natural gas

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Environmental, health, and safety concerns associated with nonpetroleum fuel use in US transportation — Research Paper | ScholarLens