The grounded theory alternative in business network research
Seán de Búrca, Damien McLoughlin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Seán de Búrca, Damien McLoughlin
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper presents a brief outline of the defining characteristics of grounded theory\nmethodology. Such a focus was motivated by a desire to bring the methodology into\nclearer focus. Particular attention is paid to the debate grounded theory has\nengendered. In doing so, a number of misunderstandings, dilemmas and criticisms\nare highlighted. Thus, while one research strategy should not be emphasised to the\nexclusion of others, this paper advocates the use of grounded theory methodology\nas a fresh approach in addressing some of the research challenges associated with\nnetwork studies.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents a brief outline of the defining characteristics of grounded theory\nmethodology. Such a focus was motivated by a desire to bring the methodology into\nclearer focus. Particular attention is paid to the debate grounded theory has\nengendered. In doing so, a number of misunderstandings, dilemmas and criticisms\nare highlighted. Thus, while one research strategy should not be emphasised to the\nexclusion of others, this paper advocates the use of grounded theory methodology\nas a fresh approach in addressing some of the research challenges associated with\nnetwork studies.
Key concepts: Grounded theory, Focus (optics), Epistemology, Sociology, Management science, Actor–network theory, Qualitative research, Engineering ethics