How do subjects assess the Social Trade-off. Involved in the Prisoners' Dilemma?
Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Antonio J. Morales
Abstract
Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Antonio J. Morales
Abstract
In this paper we obtain the value that experimental subjects attach to a prisoners' dilemma game by applying a related procedure to BDM (1964). We also obtain the value of a closely related game which does not incorporate any social dilemma. By comparing both values, we are able to classify subjects in di.erent categories: (i) 16% of the subjects responded to the social dilemma by playing the cooperative strategy, (ii) The remaining subjects (84%) did not played the cooperative strategy and moreover, 53% of the subjects behaved as if the social dilemma was not an issue at all.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper we obtain the value that experimental subjects attach to a prisoners' dilemma game by applying a related procedure to BDM (1964). We also obtain the value of a closely related game which does not incorporate any social dilemma. By comparing both values, we are able to classify subjects in di.erent categories: (i) 16% of the subjects responded to the social dilemma by playing the cooperative strategy, (ii) The remaining subjects (84%) did not played the cooperative strategy and moreover, 53% of the subjects behaved as if the social dilemma was not an issue at all.
Key concepts: Dilemma, Prisoner's dilemma, Social dilemma, Superrationality, Value (mathematics), Social psychology, Psychology, Game theory