2007Novartis Foundation symposiumRequires access

The Cat Infected with Brugia Pahangi as a Model of Human Filariasis

D. A. Denham, Catherine Fletcher

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The responses of cats to Brugia pahangi, which parasitizes them in nature, mimic those of humans to Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti in many important respects. It is likely that many of the features of the relationship between host and parasite that can be studied in cats infected with B. pahangi also apply to humans, but for a variety of practical reasons cannot be demonstrated in humans. Both immunologically and parasitologically there is a profound difference between B. pahangi-infected cats that have microfilariae in their blood and those that either do not become microfilaraemic or clear their blood of microfilariae and become post-microfilaraemic. Microfilaraemic cats are susceptible to reinfection and fail to recognize the surface of the sheath of microfilariae. They also do not produce antibodies against several components recognized by post-microfilaraemic cats. Cats that have destroyed their microfilariae also destroy their adult worms and are very resistant to challenge with infective larvae. Apart from the unique ability to recognize the sheath of microfilariae in fluorescent antibody tests, sera from these cats react with microfilarial antigens at 61-81 kDa, antigens of infective larvae at 22 and 18.5 kDa and adult antigens at 34, 18, 16, 13 and 11.5 kDa. None of these antigens are recognized by microfilaraemic cats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The responses of cats to Brugia pahangi, which parasitizes them in nature, mimic those of humans to Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti in many important respects. It is likely that many of the features of the relationship between host and parasite that can be studied in cats infected with B. pahangi also apply to humans, but for a variety of practical reasons cannot be demonstrated in humans. Both immunologically and parasitologically there is a profound difference between B. pahangi-infected cats that have microfilariae in their blood and those that either do not become microfilaraemic or clear their blood of microfilariae and become post-microfilaraemic. Microfilaraemic cats are susceptible to reinfection and fail to recognize the surface of the sheath of microfilariae. They also do not produce antibodies against several components recognized by post-microfilaraemic cats. Cats that have destroyed their microfilariae also destroy their adult worms and are very resistant to challenge with infective larvae. Apart from the unique ability to recognize the sheath of microfilariae in fluorescent antibody tests, sera from these cats react with microfilarial antigens at 61-81 kDa, antigens of infective larvae at 22 and 18.5 kDa and adult antigens at 34, 18, 16, 13 and 11.5 kDa. None of these antigens are recognized by microfilaraemic cats.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The responses of cats to Brugia pahangi, which parasitizes them in nature, mimic those of humans to Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti in many important respects. It is likely that many of the features of the relationship between host and parasite that can be studied in cats infected with B. pahangi also apply to humans, but for a variety of practical reasons cannot be demonstrated in humans. Both immunologically and parasitologically there is a profound difference between B. pahangi-infected cats that have microfilariae in their blood and those that either do not become microfilaraemic or clear their blood of microfilariae and become post-microfilaraemic. Microfilaraemic cats are susceptible to reinfection and fail to recognize the surface of the sheath of microfilariae. They also do not produce antibodies against several components recognized by post-microfilaraemic cats. Cats that have destroyed their microfilariae also destroy their adult worms and are very resistant to challenge with infective larvae. Apart from the unique ability to recognize the sheath of microfilariae in fluorescent antibody tests, sera from these cats react with microfilarial antigens at 61-81 kDa, antigens of infective larvae at 22 and 18.5 kDa and adult antigens at 34, 18, 16, 13 and 11.5 kDa. None of these antigens are recognized by microfilaraemic cats.

Key concepts: Brugia pahangi, CATS, Microfilaria, Filariasis, Brugia malayi, Wuchereria bancrofti, Antigen, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Cat Infected with Brugia Pahangi as a Model of Human Filariasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens