ScholarLens Back to search
1956•The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

Procedure, Section II - Issue for Jury (Survey of Virginia Case Law - 1955)

James Leftwich

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

dissented to this ruling, maintaining that physical factors were properly jury considerations for the determination of their appropriate evidential weight 2 Norfolk & W.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

dissented to this ruling, maintaining that physical factors were properly jury considerations for the determination of their appropriate evidential weight 2 Norfolk & W.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

dissented to this ruling, maintaining that physical factors were properly jury considerations for the determination of their appropriate evidential weight 2 Norfolk & W.

Key concepts: Section (typography), Law, Jury, Political science, Business, Advertising

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Procedure, Section II - Issue for Jury (Survey of Virginia Case Law - 1955) — Research Paper | ScholarLens