2006Santa Clara Law Digital Commons (Santa Clara University)Requires access

Representative Patent Claims: Their Use in Appeals to the Board and in Infringement Litigation

Patricia E. Campbell

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In general every patent claim is considered a separate invention. However, in certain instances, multiple claims are grouped together and the patentee’s rights are determined with respect to these “representative claims.” This article examines the representative claims procedure utilized in patent prosecution and litigation. The recent changes in the rules governing the appeals of a rejected patent claim before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences are highlighted first, followed by an examination of the use of representative claims in patent litigation and proposals for some guidelines for the selection of representative claims.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In general every patent claim is considered a separate invention. However, in certain instances, multiple claims are grouped together and the patentee’s rights are determined with respect to these “representative claims.” This article examines the representative claims procedure utilized in patent prosecution and litigation. The recent changes in the rules governing the appeals of a rejected patent claim before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences are highlighted first, followed by an examination of the use of representative claims in patent litigation and proposals for some guidelines for the selection of representative claims.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In general every patent claim is considered a separate invention. However, in certain instances, multiple claims are grouped together and the patentee’s rights are determined with respect to these “representative claims.” This article examines the representative claims procedure utilized in patent prosecution and litigation. The recent changes in the rules governing the appeals of a rejected patent claim before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences are highlighted first, followed by an examination of the use of representative claims in patent litigation and proposals for some guidelines for the selection of representative claims.

Key concepts: Patent infringement, Patent troll, Jury, Patent Act, Statute, Trademark, Intellectual property, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Representative Patent Claims: Their Use in Appeals to the Board and in Infringement Litigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens