Representative Patent Claims: Their Use in Appeals to the Board and in Infringement Litigation
Patricia E. Campbell
Abstract
Patricia E. Campbell
Abstract
In general every patent claim is considered a separate invention. However, in certain instances, multiple claims are grouped together and the patentee’s rights are determined with respect to these “representative claims.” This article examines the representative claims procedure utilized in patent prosecution and litigation. The recent changes in the rules governing the appeals of a rejected patent claim before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences are highlighted first, followed by an examination of the use of representative claims in patent litigation and proposals for some guidelines for the selection of representative claims.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In general every patent claim is considered a separate invention. However, in certain instances, multiple claims are grouped together and the patentee’s rights are determined with respect to these “representative claims.” This article examines the representative claims procedure utilized in patent prosecution and litigation. The recent changes in the rules governing the appeals of a rejected patent claim before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences are highlighted first, followed by an examination of the use of representative claims in patent litigation and proposals for some guidelines for the selection of representative claims.
Key concepts: Patent infringement, Patent troll, Jury, Patent Act, Statute, Trademark, Intellectual property, Law