1986•PubMedRequires access

Magnetic resonance imaging of the nasopharynx and skull base.

Robert B. Lufkin, William H. Hanafee

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Ten patients with a normal nasopharynx and 36 patients with pathology of the nasopharynx or skull base were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Four millimeter thick axial, coronal, and often sagittal scans were obtained using SE 500/28 and SE 2000/56 pulse sequences. The normal scans were compared with cadaver cryosections. Correlation was made with computed tomography (CT) scans as well as with clinical history and physical examination whenever possible. MRI clearly provided superior information compared with CT and other imaging studies. Advantages of MRI over CT include 1) the delineation of tumor infiltrations of the longus colli muscles, rectus capitus muscles, and muscles of mastication, 2) demonstration of tumor extensions into the skull base or parapharyngeal spaces, and 3) demonstration of both normal and pathologic cranial nerves. For all these reasons, MRI is currently the imaging study of choice for pathology of the nasopharynx and skull base.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ten patients with a normal nasopharynx and 36 patients with pathology of the nasopharynx or skull base were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Four millimeter thick axial, coronal, and often sagittal scans were obtained using SE 500/28 and SE 2000/56 pulse sequences. The normal scans were compared with cadaver cryosections. Correlation was made with computed tomography (CT) scans as well as with clinical history and physical examination whenever possible. MRI clearly provided superior information compared with CT and other imaging studies. Advantages of MRI over CT include 1) the delineation of tumor infiltrations of the longus colli muscles, rectus capitus muscles, and muscles of mastication, 2) demonstration of tumor extensions into the skull base or parapharyngeal spaces, and 3) demonstration of both normal and pathologic cranial nerves. For all these reasons, MRI is currently the imaging study of choice for pathology of the nasopharynx and skull base.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ten patients with a normal nasopharynx and 36 patients with pathology of the nasopharynx or skull base were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Four millimeter thick axial, coronal, and often sagittal scans were obtained using SE 500/28 and SE 2000/56 pulse sequences. The normal scans were compared with cadaver cryosections. Correlation was made with computed tomography (CT) scans as well as with clinical history and physical examination whenever possible. MRI clearly provided superior information compared with CT and other imaging studies. Advantages of MRI over CT include 1) the delineation of tumor infiltrations of the longus colli muscles, rectus capitus muscles, and muscles of mastication, 2) demonstration of tumor extensions into the skull base or parapharyngeal spaces, and 3) demonstration of both normal and pathologic cranial nerves. For all these reasons, MRI is currently the imaging study of choice for pathology of the nasopharynx and skull base.

Key concepts: Medicine, Skull, Magnetic resonance imaging, Sagittal plane, Coronal plane, Anatomy, Parapharyngeal space, Cadaver

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetic resonance imaging of the nasopharynx and skull base. — Research Paper | ScholarLens