1989RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Forward Induction: Experimental Evidence From Two-Stage Games With Complete Information

Jordi Brandts, Charles A. Holt

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Forward induction is the general notion that the sequence of decisions leading to a subgame can be interpreted as a type of communication that can rule out unreasonable beliefs in the subgame, including some beliefs that are consistent with the backward-induction rationality of a sequential equilibrium. Subjects participated in a sequence of two-stage experimental games with multiple sequential equilibria. Decisions are generally consistent with the equilibrium outcome that is not eliminated with forward-induction arguments, and this consistency increases with experience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Forward induction is the general notion that the sequence of decisions leading to a subgame can be interpreted as a type of communication that can rule out unreasonable beliefs in the subgame, including some beliefs that are consistent with the backward-induction rationality of a sequential equilibrium. Subjects participated in a sequence of two-stage experimental games with multiple sequential equilibria. Decisions are generally consistent with the equilibrium outcome that is not eliminated with forward-induction arguments, and this consistency increases with experience.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Forward induction is the general notion that the sequence of decisions leading to a subgame can be interpreted as a type of communication that can rule out unreasonable beliefs in the subgame, including some beliefs that are consistent with the backward-induction rationality of a sequential equilibrium. Subjects participated in a sequence of two-stage experimental games with multiple sequential equilibria. Decisions are generally consistent with the equilibrium outcome that is not eliminated with forward-induction arguments, and this consistency increases with experience.

Key concepts: Backward induction, Subgame, Subgame perfect equilibrium, Sequential equilibrium, Consistency (knowledge bases), Sequence (biology), Mathematical economics, Rationality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Forward Induction: Experimental Evidence From Two-Stage Games With Complete Information — Research Paper | ScholarLens