Forward Induction: Experimental Evidence From Two-Stage Games With Complete Information
Jordi Brandts, Charles A. Holt
Abstract
Jordi Brandts, Charles A. Holt
Abstract
Forward induction is the general notion that the sequence of decisions leading to a subgame can be interpreted as a type of communication that can rule out unreasonable beliefs in the subgame, including some beliefs that are consistent with the backward-induction rationality of a sequential equilibrium. Subjects participated in a sequence of two-stage experimental games with multiple sequential equilibria. Decisions are generally consistent with the equilibrium outcome that is not eliminated with forward-induction arguments, and this consistency increases with experience.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Forward induction is the general notion that the sequence of decisions leading to a subgame can be interpreted as a type of communication that can rule out unreasonable beliefs in the subgame, including some beliefs that are consistent with the backward-induction rationality of a sequential equilibrium. Subjects participated in a sequence of two-stage experimental games with multiple sequential equilibria. Decisions are generally consistent with the equilibrium outcome that is not eliminated with forward-induction arguments, and this consistency increases with experience.
Key concepts: Backward induction, Subgame, Subgame perfect equilibrium, Sequential equilibrium, Consistency (knowledge bases), Sequence (biology), Mathematical economics, Rationality