2004•PubMedRequires access

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in two populations with different prevalences of atopy.

Rain Jögi, Christer Janson, G Boman, Bengt Björkstén

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

SETTING: Random population samples of young adults from Tartu, Estonia (n = 307) and Uppsala, Sweden (n = 498) in the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and risk factors for bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine in two centres with similar climate and ethnicity but differences in the prevalence of atopy, asthma and respiratory symptoms. DESIGN: General population-based cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: The prevalence of BHR using the cut-off points 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 mg was 19%, 12% and 8% in Tartu and 11%, 7% and 2%, respectively, in Uppsala. Current smoking was a common risk factor for BHR in both centres. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.9), sensitisation to cat (OR 5.9) and visible mould in the home (OR 2.4) were independent risk factors for BHR in Tartu. In Uppsala, BHR was significantly associated with total IgE levels (OR 2.0) and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (OR 3.3). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of BHR can explain the high prevalence of respiratory symptoms in Tartu and indicates that causes other than asthma and atopy can be responsible for the high prevalence of BHR in a population.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SETTING: Random population samples of young adults from Tartu, Estonia (n = 307) and Uppsala, Sweden (n = 498) in the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and risk factors for bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine in two centres with similar climate and ethnicity but differences in the prevalence of atopy, asthma and respiratory symptoms. DESIGN: General population-based cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: The prevalence of BHR using the cut-off points 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 mg was 19%, 12% and 8% in Tartu and 11%, 7% and 2%, respectively, in Uppsala. Current smoking was a common risk factor for BHR in both centres. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.9), sensitisation to cat (OR 5.9) and visible mould in the home (OR 2.4) were independent risk factors for BHR in Tartu. In Uppsala, BHR was significantly associated with total IgE levels (OR 2.0) and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (OR 3.3). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of BHR can explain the high prevalence of respiratory symptoms in Tartu and indicates that causes other than asthma and atopy can be responsible for the high prevalence of BHR in a population.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SETTING: Random population samples of young adults from Tartu, Estonia (n = 307) and Uppsala, Sweden (n = 498) in the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and risk factors for bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine in two centres with similar climate and ethnicity but differences in the prevalence of atopy, asthma and respiratory symptoms. DESIGN: General population-based cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: The prevalence of BHR using the cut-off points 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 mg was 19%, 12% and 8% in Tartu and 11%, 7% and 2%, respectively, in Uppsala. Current smoking was a common risk factor for BHR in both centres. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.9), sensitisation to cat (OR 5.9) and visible mould in the home (OR 2.4) were independent risk factors for BHR in Tartu. In Uppsala, BHR was significantly associated with total IgE levels (OR 2.0) and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (OR 3.3). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of BHR can explain the high prevalence of respiratory symptoms in Tartu and indicates that causes other than asthma and atopy can be responsible for the high prevalence of BHR in a population.

Key concepts: Atopy, Medicine, Bronchial hyperresponsiveness, Asthma, Odds ratio, Population, Epidemiology, Risk factor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in two populations with different prevalences of atopy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens