1974Limnology and OceanographyRequires access

The use of a deep tank in plankton ecology. 2. Efficiency of a planktonic food chain1

Michael M. Mullin, Pamela M. Evans

Open publisher page 60 citations

Abstract

Populations of copepods and ctenophores were maintained in a quasi‐steady state in a 70‐m3 tank supplied with phytoplankton and harvested regularly for several months. Paracalanus parvus replaced Acartia tonsa as the dominant copepod; in the absence of ctenophores, the yield of copepods was 10.4–12.5% of the phytoplankton supplied as food. When the carnivorous ctenophores were present, their yield was 2.6% of the phytoplankton supplied but could have been as high as 3.2% had not copepods been harvested simultaneously.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Populations of copepods and ctenophores were maintained in a quasi‐steady state in a 70‐m3 tank supplied with phytoplankton and harvested regularly for several months. Paracalanus parvus replaced Acartia tonsa as the dominant copepod; in the absence of ctenophores, the yield of copepods was 10.4–12.5% of the phytoplankton supplied as food. When the carnivorous ctenophores were present, their yield was 2.6% of the phytoplankton supplied but could have been as high as 3.2% had not copepods been harvested simultaneously.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 60 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Populations of copepods and ctenophores were maintained in a quasi‐steady state in a 70‐m3 tank supplied with phytoplankton and harvested regularly for several months. Paracalanus parvus replaced Acartia tonsa as the dominant copepod; in the absence of ctenophores, the yield of copepods was 10.4–12.5% of the phytoplankton supplied as food. When the carnivorous ctenophores were present, their yield was 2.6% of the phytoplankton supplied but could have been as high as 3.2% had not copepods been harvested simultaneously.

Key concepts: Acartia tonsa, Copepod, Phytoplankton, Plankton, Biology, Ecology, Zooplankton, Yield (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The use of a deep tank in plankton ecology. 2. Efficiency of a planktonic food chain1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens