Canons Old and New? the Undergraduate History Curriculum in 2004
Millar Carly, Mark Peel
Abstract
Millar Carly, Mark Peel
Abstract
This article summarises the main findings of a survey, conducted for the Australian Historical Association, of undergraduate history curricula in Australia, Fiji, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. While curriculum change and planning seem more ad hoc than most academic historians would like, a particularly interesting phenomenon is the emergence of a new kind of ‘canon’, in which large-scale, comparative and global histories - sometimes organised around a particular theme or question - serve as the chief base for later specialisations in national and thematic histories.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article summarises the main findings of a survey, conducted for the Australian Historical Association, of undergraduate history curricula in Australia, Fiji, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. While curriculum change and planning seem more ad hoc than most academic historians would like, a particularly interesting phenomenon is the emergence of a new kind of ‘canon’, in which large-scale, comparative and global histories - sometimes organised around a particular theme or question - serve as the chief base for later specialisations in national and thematic histories.
Key concepts: Curriculum, Theme (computing), Phenomenon, New guinea, History, Sociology, Media studies, Scale (ratio)