Molecular phylogeny, evolution and classification of the H ydrophilidae ( C oleoptera)
Andrew E. Z. Short, Martin Fikáček
Abstract
Andrew E. Z. Short, Martin Fikáček
Abstract
Abstract The phylogeny and evolutionary history of the water scavenger beetles ( C oleoptera: H ydrophilidae) are inferred from comprehensive analyses of DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial genes COI , COII and 16S and the nuclear genes 18S , 28S and arginine kinase . Bayesian and maximum parsimony analyses included 151 taxa, representing all subfamilies, tribes and subtribes that have ever been proposed in the family, as well as representatives of the hydrophiloid families H elophoridae, H ydrochidae, S percheidae, E pimetopidae and G eorissidae. The resulting well‐supported trees strongly disagree with prior classifications of the H ydrophilidae, suggesting that the smaller subfamilies ( H orelophinae, H orelophopsinae and S phaeridiinae) are derived from within the larger H ydrophilinae. The existing tribal classification is more compatible with our results, but many significant differences are evident. Here, we present a new classification of the H ydrophilidae comprising 6 subfamilies and 12 tribes. Each subfamily and tribe is reviewed in detail with (i) a morphological diagnosis, including known or putative morphological synapomorphies, (ii) its taxonomic circumscription, including genera not included in our analyses, and (iii) a review of its general biology and geographic distribution. A new identification key to subfamily and tribe based on adult morphology is also provided. The newly adopted classification requires the following taxonomic changes: the subfamily H ydrophilinae sensu n. is redefined to include only the tribes A mphiopini stat.n. (removed from the synonymy with the C haetarthriini), B erosini, L accobiini, H ydrophilini and H ydrobiusini (= S perchopsini syn.n. ); the subfamily C haetarthriinae stat.n. is removed from synonymy with the H ydrophilinae and includes the tribes C haetarthriini and A nacaenini (= H orelophinae syn.n. ); the A cidocerinae stat.n. (= H orelophopsinae syn.n. ) and R ygmodinae stat.n. (= Andotypini syn.n. , B orborophorini syn.n. and T ormissini syn.n.) are elevated to subfamily rank; and the subfamily E nochrinae subfam.n. is established for the genus Enochrus and its relatives. The implications for the morphological evolution, ecological transitions and biogeography of the family are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 148 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The phylogeny and evolutionary history of the water scavenger beetles ( C oleoptera: H ydrophilidae) are inferred from comprehensive analyses of DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial genes COI , COII and 16S and the nuclear genes 18S , 28S and arginine kinase . Bayesian and maximum parsimony analyses included 151 taxa, representing all subfamilies, tribes and subtribes that have ever been proposed in the family, as well as representatives of the hydrophiloid families H elophoridae, H ydrochidae, S percheidae, E pimetopidae and G eorissidae. The resulting well‐supported trees strongly disagree with prior classifications of the H ydrophilidae, suggesting that the smaller subfamilies ( H orelophinae, H orelophopsinae and S phaeridiinae) are derived from within the larger H ydrophilinae. The existing tribal classification is more compatible with our results, but many significant differences are evident. Here, we present a new classification of the H ydrophilidae comprising 6 subfamilies and 12 tribes. Each subfamily and tribe is reviewed in detail with (i) a morphological diagnosis, including known or putative morphological synapomorphies, (ii) its taxonomic circumscription, including genera not included in our analyses, and (iii) a review of its general biology and geographic distribution. A new identification key to subfamily and tribe based on adult morphology is also provided. The newly adopted classification requires the following taxonomic changes: the subfamily H ydrophilinae sensu n. is redefined to include only the tribes A mphiopini stat.n. (removed from the synonymy with the C haetarthriini), B erosini, L accobiini, H ydrophilini and H ydrobiusini (= S perchopsini syn.n. ); the subfamily C haetarthriinae stat.n. is removed from synonymy with the H ydrophilinae and includes the tribes C haetarthriini and A nacaenini (= H orelophinae syn.n. ); the A cidocerinae stat.n. (= H orelophopsinae syn.n. ) and R ygmodinae stat.n. (= Andotypini syn.n. , B orborophorini syn.n. and T ormissini syn.n.) are elevated to subfamily rank; and the subfamily E nochrinae subfam.n. is established for the genus Enochrus and its relatives. The implications for the morphological evolution, ecological transitions and biogeography of the family are discussed.
Key concepts: Subfamily, Biology, Tribe, Phylogenetics, Taxon, Synapomorphy, Sensu, Maximum parsimony