2006•Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University)Open access

The Aftermath of In Re 2001 Redistricting Cases: The Need for a New Constitutional Scheme for Legislative Redistricting in Alaska

Gordon Scott Harrison

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In this Comment, the former executive director of the Alaska Redistricting Board argues that the proper forum for redistricting in Alaska is the state legislature, with procedural safeguards to ensure the minority party a voice.This Comment describes the history of redistricting and the process by which the 2000 districts were formulated.This Comment analyzes the process and critiques its shortfalls; it concludes that a change in redistricting policy is needed to avoid litigation and provide for more equitable redistricting to occur. I.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this Comment, the former executive director of the Alaska Redistricting Board argues that the proper forum for redistricting in Alaska is the state legislature, with procedural safeguards to ensure the minority party a voice.This Comment describes the history of redistricting and the process by which the 2000 districts were formulated.This Comment analyzes the process and critiques its shortfalls; it concludes that a change in redistricting policy is needed to avoid litigation and provide for more equitable redistricting to occur. I.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this Comment, the former executive director of the Alaska Redistricting Board argues that the proper forum for redistricting in Alaska is the state legislature, with procedural safeguards to ensure the minority party a voice.This Comment describes the history of redistricting and the process by which the 2000 districts were formulated.This Comment analyzes the process and critiques its shortfalls; it concludes that a change in redistricting policy is needed to avoid litigation and provide for more equitable redistricting to occur. I.

Key concepts: Redistricting, Legislature, State (computer science), Political science, Law, Public administration, Law and economics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Aftermath of In Re 2001 Redistricting Cases: The Need for a New Constitutional Scheme for Legislative Redistricting in Alaska — Research Paper | ScholarLens