The Supreme Court and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Unfulfilled Promise
Erwin Chemerinsky
Abstract
Open-access reader
Erwin Chemerinsky
Abstract
Open-access reader
1. Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) (declaring Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and holding in part that slaves are property, not citizens).2. The first sentence of Section 1 states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
1. Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) (declaring Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and holding in part that slaves are property, not citizens).2. The first sentence of Section 1 states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United
Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Amendment, Political science