1992•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

The Supreme Court and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Unfulfilled Promise

Erwin Chemerinsky

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

1. Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) (declaring Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and holding in part that slaves are property, not citizens).2. The first sentence of Section 1 states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) (declaring Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and holding in part that slaves are property, not citizens).2. The first sentence of Section 1 states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) (declaring Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and holding in part that slaves are property, not citizens).2. The first sentence of Section 1 states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Amendment, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Supreme Court and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Unfulfilled Promise — Research Paper | ScholarLens