Improving Prevention Compliance through Appropriate Incentives: Theoretical Modelling and Empirical Evidence
Udo Schneider, Jürgen Zerth
Abstract
Open-access reader
Udo Schneider, Jürgen Zerth
Abstract
Open-access reader
Summary This paper explores the effects of insurance parameters and complementary information environment on the patient’s primary prevention activity. The theoretical model is based on a principal-agent setting in which the patient acts as an agent in deciding about his prevention efforts. The insurer chooses the coverage level and therefore the level of patient’s cost sharing and decides on his monitoring activities. The empirical analysis looks at the patient’s prevention decision in the case of smoking. Using a hazard model in discrete time, the decision to change behaviour depends on health status, education, age and working time but not on the insurance system.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summary This paper explores the effects of insurance parameters and complementary information environment on the patient’s primary prevention activity. The theoretical model is based on a principal-agent setting in which the patient acts as an agent in deciding about his prevention efforts. The insurer chooses the coverage level and therefore the level of patient’s cost sharing and decides on his monitoring activities. The empirical analysis looks at the patient’s prevention decision in the case of smoking. Using a hazard model in discrete time, the decision to change behaviour depends on health status, education, age and working time but not on the insurance system.
Key concepts: Incentive, Compliance (psychology), Actuarial science, Principal (computer security), Moral hazard, Empirical evidence, Health insurance, Empirical research