1992•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Development of Measures of Crew Coordination

Róbert Šimon, Riser, Daniel T., Eugene A. Pawlik

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This report describes the development of a reliable, objective, and quantitative set of metrics for measuring and assessing aircrew coordination in terms of aviator performance and safety. Based on a review of programs to evaluate aircrew coordination in the commercial and military sectors, three rating instruments were developed for specific application to UH-60 helicopter aircrews. These instruments included a military adaptation of the Cockpit Management Attitudes Questionnaire (CMAQ), the Aircrew Coordination Evaluation Checklist, and a revised set of Aircrew Training Manual (ATM) maneuver standards. All three instruments were used by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) to evaluate UH-60 aircrews in May 1990 at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Data from this experiment are being analyzed by ARI and will provide a basis for developing training standards and methods in this area. Helicopters, Aircrew coordination, Aircrew training, Cockpit procedures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report describes the development of a reliable, objective, and quantitative set of metrics for measuring and assessing aircrew coordination in terms of aviator performance and safety. Based on a review of programs to evaluate aircrew coordination in the commercial and military sectors, three rating instruments were developed for specific application to UH-60 helicopter aircrews. These instruments included a military adaptation of the Cockpit Management Attitudes Questionnaire (CMAQ), the Aircrew Coordination Evaluation Checklist, and a revised set of Aircrew Training Manual (ATM) maneuver standards. All three instruments were used by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) to evaluate UH-60 aircrews in May 1990 at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Data from this experiment are being analyzed by ARI and will provide a basis for developing training standards and methods in this area. Helicopters, Aircrew coordination, Aircrew training, Cockpit procedures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report describes the development of a reliable, objective, and quantitative set of metrics for measuring and assessing aircrew coordination in terms of aviator performance and safety. Based on a review of programs to evaluate aircrew coordination in the commercial and military sectors, three rating instruments were developed for specific application to UH-60 helicopter aircrews. These instruments included a military adaptation of the Cockpit Management Attitudes Questionnaire (CMAQ), the Aircrew Coordination Evaluation Checklist, and a revised set of Aircrew Training Manual (ATM) maneuver standards. All three instruments were used by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) to evaluate UH-60 aircrews in May 1990 at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Data from this experiment are being analyzed by ARI and will provide a basis for developing training standards and methods in this area. Helicopters, Aircrew coordination, Aircrew training, Cockpit procedures.

Key concepts: Aircrew, Crew, Cockpit, Aeronautics, Engineering, Checklist, Adaptation (eye), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of Measures of Crew Coordination — Research Paper | ScholarLens