2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Interpretation of Renal Biopsies in IgA Nephropathy

H. Terence Cook

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The renal biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of IgA nephropathy. It should also be possible to derive important information from the biopsy about prognosis and likely response to treatment. Biopsy features that are associated with progression to end-stage renal disease are glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial scarring, marked crescent formation and marked arteriolar hyalinosis. However, with our present classification systems the renal biopsy adds little over and above clinical features in predicting outcome. It may be possible to improve the predictive value of the renal biopsy by adopting the following recommendations in developing new classifications: (1) looking at the ability of the biopsy to predict changes in renal function in the short term after biopsy rather than prediction of progression to end stage renal disease; (2) examining subgroups of patients where the biopsy is likely to be most informative; (3) distinguishing the effects of reversible and irreversible changes particularly with regard to response to treatment; (4) ensuring uniformity of definitions between pathologists, and (5) paying attention to small lesions and considering including additional biopsy features. The most important role for the renal biopsy in the future is likely to be in predicting response to therapy rather than predicting progression to end-stage renal disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The renal biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of IgA nephropathy. It should also be possible to derive important information from the biopsy about prognosis and likely response to treatment. Biopsy features that are associated with progression to end-stage renal disease are glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial scarring, marked crescent formation and marked arteriolar hyalinosis. However, with our present classification systems the renal biopsy adds little over and above clinical features in predicting outcome. It may be possible to improve the predictive value of the renal biopsy by adopting the following recommendations in developing new classifications: (1) looking at the ability of the biopsy to predict changes in renal function in the short term after biopsy rather than prediction of progression to end stage renal disease; (2) examining subgroups of patients where the biopsy is likely to be most informative; (3) distinguishing the effects of reversible and irreversible changes particularly with regard to response to treatment; (4) ensuring uniformity of definitions between pathologists, and (5) paying attention to small lesions and considering including additional biopsy features. The most important role for the renal biopsy in the future is likely to be in predicting response to therapy rather than predicting progression to end-stage renal disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The renal biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of IgA nephropathy. It should also be possible to derive important information from the biopsy about prognosis and likely response to treatment. Biopsy features that are associated with progression to end-stage renal disease are glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial scarring, marked crescent formation and marked arteriolar hyalinosis. However, with our present classification systems the renal biopsy adds little over and above clinical features in predicting outcome. It may be possible to improve the predictive value of the renal biopsy by adopting the following recommendations in developing new classifications: (1) looking at the ability of the biopsy to predict changes in renal function in the short term after biopsy rather than prediction of progression to end stage renal disease; (2) examining subgroups of patients where the biopsy is likely to be most informative; (3) distinguishing the effects of reversible and irreversible changes particularly with regard to response to treatment; (4) ensuring uniformity of definitions between pathologists, and (5) paying attention to small lesions and considering including additional biopsy features. The most important role for the renal biopsy in the future is likely to be in predicting response to therapy rather than predicting progression to end-stage renal disease.

Key concepts: Biopsy, Renal biopsy, Medicine, Nephropathy, Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, Renal function, Disease, Glomerulosclerosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interpretation of Renal Biopsies in IgA Nephropathy — Research Paper | ScholarLens