2011Conservation LettersOpen access

A landscape‐based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population

Eric Wikramanayake, Eric Dinerstein, John Seidensticker, Susan Lumpkin, Bivash Pandav, Mahendra Shrestha, Hemanta R. Mishra, Jonathan D. Ballou, A. J. T. Johnsingh, Igor E. Chestin, Sunarto Sunarto, Phuntsho Thinley, Kanchan Thapa, Guangshun Jiang, Sivananthan Elagupillay, Hemanta Kafley, Narendra Man Babu Pradhan, Karma Jigme, Teak Seng, Peter Cutter, Md. Abdul Aziz, Utin Than

Open full text 199 citations

Abstract

Abstract In an unprecedented response to the rapid decline in wild tiger populations, the Heads of Government of the 13 tiger range countries endorsed the St. Petersburg Declaration in November 2010, pledging to double the wild tiger population. We conducted a landscape analysis of tiger habitat to determine if a recovery of such magnitude is possible. The reserves in 20 priority tiger landscapes can potentially support >10,000 tigers, almost thrice the current estimate. However, most core reserves where tigers breed are small and land‐use change in rapidly developing Asia threatens to increase reserve and population isolation. Maintaining population viability and resilience will depend upon a landscape approach to manage tigers as metapopulations. Thus, both site‐level protection and landscape‐scale interventions to secure habitat corridors are simultaneous imperatives. Co‐benefits, such as payment schemes for carbon and other ecosystem services, should be employed as strategies to mainstream landscape conservation in tiger habitat into development processes.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In an unprecedented response to the rapid decline in wild tiger populations, the Heads of Government of the 13 tiger range countries endorsed the St. Petersburg Declaration in November 2010, pledging to double the wild tiger population. We conducted a landscape analysis of tiger habitat to determine if a recovery of such magnitude is possible. The reserves in 20 priority tiger landscapes can potentially support >10,000 tigers, almost thrice the current estimate. However, most core reserves where tigers breed are small and land‐use change in rapidly developing Asia threatens to increase reserve and population isolation. Maintaining population viability and resilience will depend upon a landscape approach to manage tigers as metapopulations. Thus, both site‐level protection and landscape‐scale interventions to secure habitat corridors are simultaneous imperatives. Co‐benefits, such as payment schemes for carbon and other ecosystem services, should be employed as strategies to mainstream landscape conservation in tiger habitat into development processes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 199 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In an unprecedented response to the rapid decline in wild tiger populations, the Heads of Government of the 13 tiger range countries endorsed the St. Petersburg Declaration in November 2010, pledging to double the wild tiger population. We conducted a landscape analysis of tiger habitat to determine if a recovery of such magnitude is possible. The reserves in 20 priority tiger landscapes can potentially support >10,000 tigers, almost thrice the current estimate. However, most core reserves where tigers breed are small and land‐use change in rapidly developing Asia threatens to increase reserve and population isolation. Maintaining population viability and resilience will depend upon a landscape approach to manage tigers as metapopulations. Thus, both site‐level protection and landscape‐scale interventions to secure habitat corridors are simultaneous imperatives. Co‐benefits, such as payment schemes for carbon and other ecosystem services, should be employed as strategies to mainstream landscape conservation in tiger habitat into development processes.

Key concepts: Tiger, Wildlife corridor, Geography, Population, Habitat, Metapopulation, Landscape connectivity, Poaching

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A landscape‐based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population — Research Paper | ScholarLens