2008Psychotherapy in Private PracticeRequires access

A Modern Epistemological Basis for Rational-Emotive Theory

Leonard G. Rorer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Ellis originally formulated Rational-Emotive Theory on the basis of Logical Empiricism and the hypothetico-deductive method, the prevailing philosophy of science for psychology at the time. Irrational beliefs were defined either ostensively or in terms of their consequences, and Rational-Emotive Therapy put the burden of justifying his or her (irrational) beliefs on the client. Logical Empiricism is no longer the dominant epistemological position in philosophy, and the notion of justified belief has come under special attack by the critics of Logical Empiricism. Comprehensively Critical Rationalism suggests that we can adopt the principle of making our assertions subject to criticism, without insisting on justified knowledge. Rationality, which cannot be defined explicitly, requires that we be able to defend, but not verify (justify), our beliefs. Not all irrational beliefs lead to dysphoric emotions. Those that do are of two kinds: (a) grandiose beliefs that some object, state, or event in the world shou...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ellis originally formulated Rational-Emotive Theory on the basis of Logical Empiricism and the hypothetico-deductive method, the prevailing philosophy of science for psychology at the time. Irrational beliefs were defined either ostensively or in terms of their consequences, and Rational-Emotive Therapy put the burden of justifying his or her (irrational) beliefs on the client. Logical Empiricism is no longer the dominant epistemological position in philosophy, and the notion of justified belief has come under special attack by the critics of Logical Empiricism. Comprehensively Critical Rationalism suggests that we can adopt the principle of making our assertions subject to criticism, without insisting on justified knowledge. Rationality, which cannot be defined explicitly, requires that we be able to defend, but not verify (justify), our beliefs. Not all irrational beliefs lead to dysphoric emotions. Those that do are of two kinds: (a) grandiose beliefs that some object, state, or event in the world shou...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ellis originally formulated Rational-Emotive Theory on the basis of Logical Empiricism and the hypothetico-deductive method, the prevailing philosophy of science for psychology at the time. Irrational beliefs were defined either ostensively or in terms of their consequences, and Rational-Emotive Therapy put the burden of justifying his or her (irrational) beliefs on the client. Logical Empiricism is no longer the dominant epistemological position in philosophy, and the notion of justified belief has come under special attack by the critics of Logical Empiricism. Comprehensively Critical Rationalism suggests that we can adopt the principle of making our assertions subject to criticism, without insisting on justified knowledge. Rationality, which cannot be defined explicitly, requires that we be able to defend, but not verify (justify), our beliefs. Not all irrational beliefs lead to dysphoric emotions. Those that do are of two kinds: (a) grandiose beliefs that some object, state, or event in the world shou...

Key concepts: Empiricism, Epistemology, Irrational number, Rationalism, Rationality, Emotive, Philosophy, Philosophy of science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Modern Epistemological Basis for Rational-Emotive Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens