1984SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Warrantless Automobile Searches

Scott Glick

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, and Section 12 of Article I of the New York State Constitution, prohibit the police from conducting “unreasonable searches and seizures.” The United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have consistently interpreted these provisions to mean that searches and seizures conducted without a warrant are “per se unreasonable...subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” While warrantless searches and seizures of automobiles may be upheld under the “automobile exception,” such searches or seizures may also be justified under other legal doctrines. This monograph outlines threshold legal and factual questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys should consider at pre-trial suppression hearings when evidence is seized pursuant to warrantless automobile searches.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, and Section 12 of Article I of the New York State Constitution, prohibit the police from conducting “unreasonable searches and seizures.” The United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have consistently interpreted these provisions to mean that searches and seizures conducted without a warrant are “per se unreasonable...subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” While warrantless searches and seizures of automobiles may be upheld under the “automobile exception,” such searches or seizures may also be justified under other legal doctrines. This monograph outlines threshold legal and factual questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys should consider at pre-trial suppression hearings when evidence is seized pursuant to warrantless automobile searches.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, and Section 12 of Article I of the New York State Constitution, prohibit the police from conducting “unreasonable searches and seizures.” The United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have consistently interpreted these provisions to mean that searches and seizures conducted without a warrant are “per se unreasonable...subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” While warrantless searches and seizures of automobiles may be upheld under the “automobile exception,” such searches or seizures may also be justified under other legal doctrines. This monograph outlines threshold legal and factual questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys should consider at pre-trial suppression hearings when evidence is seized pursuant to warrantless automobile searches.

Key concepts: Search and seizure, Warrant, Constitution, Law, Probable cause, Supreme court, Due Process Clause, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Warrantless Automobile Searches — Research Paper | ScholarLens