Does EMU Make Sense for Europe
Frank Barry
Abstract
Frank Barry
Abstract
There is virtually unanimous agreement that trade integration within the European Union is to everyone's advantage. No such unanimity exists however over the net benefits, or the distribution of benefits, likely to flow from monetary union. Intense debate continues, both at the theoretical and at the empirical level, over the issue of a single currency for Europe. Advocates of EMU who focus on the political rather than the economic aspects argue that too much political capital has been invested in EMU already for the project to be postponed or abandoned. Those of the opposite persuasion focus on the tensions that will inevitably arise in the operation of the single currency; these tensions, they suggest, will use up political energy that could otherwise be devoted to the expansion of the EU, the benefits of which are not in doubt. The present paper reviews this debate. Helpful discussions with Mick Devereux, Patrick Honohan, John Bradley and UCD colleaguesare gratefully acknowledged. 1.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There is virtually unanimous agreement that trade integration within the European Union is to everyone's advantage. No such unanimity exists however over the net benefits, or the distribution of benefits, likely to flow from monetary union. Intense debate continues, both at the theoretical and at the empirical level, over the issue of a single currency for Europe. Advocates of EMU who focus on the political rather than the economic aspects argue that too much political capital has been invested in EMU already for the project to be postponed or abandoned. Those of the opposite persuasion focus on the tensions that will inevitably arise in the operation of the single currency; these tensions, they suggest, will use up political energy that could otherwise be devoted to the expansion of the EU, the benefits of which are not in doubt. The present paper reviews this debate. Helpful discussions with Mick Devereux, Patrick Honohan, John Bradley and UCD colleaguesare gratefully acknowledged. 1.
Key concepts: Unanimity, Economics, Politics, European union, Persuasion, International economics, Political union, Currency