2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

Seller Behavior in Common Value Auctions: Cursed and Cursed Again

Michael S. Visser

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: In common value auctions the winning bid often exceeds the value of the good purchased. This “winner’s curse ” is bad for the buyers, but good for the sellers. Given this, people bidding for the right to resell a good might be expected to bid more than the expected value. Furthermore, if sellers have different forecasts about the extent of the winner’s curse among buyers, then the value of the right to resell is in turn a common value good, and potential sellers might even be expected to suffer from a winner’s curse of their own. In this paper I report on results from a new experiment where one group of people enter an auction for the right to auction a common value good to another group. I find a winner’s curse among the buyers, extending the results others have found into a new experimental setting where the auctioneer is a participant in the experiment, rather than the experimenter. I also find that the sellers do overbid, and so suffer from a curse of their own.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract: In common value auctions the winning bid often exceeds the value of the good purchased. This “winner’s curse ” is bad for the buyers, but good for the sellers. Given this, people bidding for the right to resell a good might be expected to bid more than the expected value. Furthermore, if sellers have different forecasts about the extent of the winner’s curse among buyers, then the value of the right to resell is in turn a common value good, and potential sellers might even be expected to suffer from a winner’s curse of their own. In this paper I report on results from a new experiment where one group of people enter an auction for the right to auction a common value good to another group. I find a winner’s curse among the buyers, extending the results others have found into a new experimental setting where the auctioneer is a participant in the experiment, rather than the experimenter. I also find that the sellers do overbid, and so suffer from a curse of their own.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract: In common value auctions the winning bid often exceeds the value of the good purchased. This “winner’s curse ” is bad for the buyers, but good for the sellers. Given this, people bidding for the right to resell a good might be expected to bid more than the expected value. Furthermore, if sellers have different forecasts about the extent of the winner’s curse among buyers, then the value of the right to resell is in turn a common value good, and potential sellers might even be expected to suffer from a winner’s curse of their own. In this paper I report on results from a new experiment where one group of people enter an auction for the right to auction a common value good to another group. I find a winner’s curse among the buyers, extending the results others have found into a new experimental setting where the auctioneer is a participant in the experiment, rather than the experimenter. I also find that the sellers do overbid, and so suffer from a curse of their own.

Key concepts: Winner's curse, Common value auction, Curse, Bidding, Value (mathematics), Microeconomics, Forward auction, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seller Behavior in Common Value Auctions: Cursed and Cursed Again — Research Paper | ScholarLens