1997Unpublished venueRequires access

An Analysis of Theater Missile Defense Systems.

Buckley, Franklin J. James

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : This study analyzes the United States's ability to defend its troops and strategic interests from theater ballistic missile attack. Defense against these weapons requires a flexible mobile weapons system which may be deployed to any region of the world. The weapons system should be capable of assessing the engagement results and must be able to employ current joint missile defense doctrine. This study examines five theater missile defense systems currently under development capable of use and deployment by the year 2010. These systems are first judged by their ability to deploy rapidly and by multiple means, the C4I capabilities, how well each addresses various regional geographic aspects of the threat, and the intertheater mobility of the system. The weapons systems are then judged as to their feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of employment. The conclusion of this study is that no single theater missile defense system is ideally suited for or capable of defending United States troops and strategic interests against ballistic missile attack. Rather a combination of the Navy Theater Wide Defense System in combination with an area defense will provide a rapid creditable missile defense force providing the capability of exoatmospheric engagement coupled with layered defense in depth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : This study analyzes the United States's ability to defend its troops and strategic interests from theater ballistic missile attack. Defense against these weapons requires a flexible mobile weapons system which may be deployed to any region of the world. The weapons system should be capable of assessing the engagement results and must be able to employ current joint missile defense doctrine. This study examines five theater missile defense systems currently under development capable of use and deployment by the year 2010. These systems are first judged by their ability to deploy rapidly and by multiple means, the C4I capabilities, how well each addresses various regional geographic aspects of the threat, and the intertheater mobility of the system. The weapons systems are then judged as to their feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of employment. The conclusion of this study is that no single theater missile defense system is ideally suited for or capable of defending United States troops and strategic interests against ballistic missile attack. Rather a combination of the Navy Theater Wide Defense System in combination with an area defense will provide a rapid creditable missile defense force providing the capability of exoatmospheric engagement coupled with layered defense in depth.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : This study analyzes the United States's ability to defend its troops and strategic interests from theater ballistic missile attack. Defense against these weapons requires a flexible mobile weapons system which may be deployed to any region of the world. The weapons system should be capable of assessing the engagement results and must be able to employ current joint missile defense doctrine. This study examines five theater missile defense systems currently under development capable of use and deployment by the year 2010. These systems are first judged by their ability to deploy rapidly and by multiple means, the C4I capabilities, how well each addresses various regional geographic aspects of the threat, and the intertheater mobility of the system. The weapons systems are then judged as to their feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of employment. The conclusion of this study is that no single theater missile defense system is ideally suited for or capable of defending United States troops and strategic interests against ballistic missile attack. Rather a combination of the Navy Theater Wide Defense System in combination with an area defense will provide a rapid creditable missile defense force providing the capability of exoatmospheric engagement coupled with layered defense in depth.

Key concepts: Ballistic missile, Doctrine, Navy, Missile defense, Software deployment, Missile, Computer security, Aeronautics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Analysis of Theater Missile Defense Systems. — Research Paper | ScholarLens