Simple dilatation, endoscopic urethrotomy, and urethroplasty for urethral stricture in adults
Radhakrishna Narahari, Anna O’Riordan, James N’Dow, Robert Pickard
Abstract
Radhakrishna Narahari, Anna O’Riordan, James N’Dow, Robert Pickard
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine based on current evidence which intervention for urethral stricture is best in terms of efficacy and cost. Specific comparisons to be made are as follows: 1. Urethrotomy versus Urethral dilatation (including self‐dilatation); 2. Urethrotomy versus Urethroplasty; 3. Urethroplasty versus Urethral dilatation (including self‐dilatation); 4. Cost comparison.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine based on current evidence which intervention for urethral stricture is best in terms of efficacy and cost. Specific comparisons to be made are as follows: 1. Urethrotomy versus Urethral dilatation (including self‐dilatation); 2. Urethrotomy versus Urethroplasty; 3. Urethroplasty versus Urethral dilatation (including self‐dilatation); 4. Cost comparison.
Key concepts: Urethroplasty, Urethrotomy, Urethral stricture, Medicine, Surgery, Urethra