1997PubMedOpen access

Role of hyperpronation as a possible risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

J. Patrick Smith, J E Szczerba, B L Arnold, David H. Perrin, David E. Martin

Open full text 46 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hyperpronation and the occurrence of noncontact injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). DESIGN AND SETTING: Subjects were categorized as either ACL injured (ACLI) or ACL uninjured (ACLU). All ACLI subjects received their injuries from a noncontact mechanism. To justify using the ACLI subjects' uninjured legs as representative of their preinjury state, a t test was used to compare the differences between the left and right foot for the ACLU group on both measurements. Based on the results of the t test, a regression analysis was performed to determine whether group membership could be predicted from navicular drop. All measures were performed in a university athletic training room. SUBJECTS: Fourteen ACLI subjects (age = 21.07 +/- 0.83 yr, ht = 174.81+/-8.29 cm, wt = 72.32+/-13.47 kg) and 14 ACLU subjects (age = 21.14+/-2.03 yr, ht = 177.35+/-11.31 cm, wt = 72.99+/-14.81 kg) participated. MEASUREMENTS: Hyperpronation was assessed via the navicular drop test and the calcaneal stance test. RESULTS: No significant difference (p > .05) between feet for the navicular drop test was found. However, there was a significant difference (p < .05) between feet for the calcaneal stance test, and, thus, this measure was not used in the regression analysis. Using the navicular drop score, the regression analysis was unable to predict group membership. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperpronation as measured by the navicular drop test was not a predictor of ACL injury, and, thus, may not be a predisposing factor to noncontact ACL injuries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hyperpronation and the occurrence of noncontact injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). DESIGN AND SETTING: Subjects were categorized as either ACL injured (ACLI) or ACL uninjured (ACLU). All ACLI subjects received their injuries from a noncontact mechanism. To justify using the ACLI subjects' uninjured legs as representative of their preinjury state, a t test was used to compare the differences between the left and right foot for the ACLU group on both measurements. Based on the results of the t test, a regression analysis was performed to determine whether group membership could be predicted from navicular drop. All measures were performed in a university athletic training room. SUBJECTS: Fourteen ACLI subjects (age = 21.07 +/- 0.83 yr, ht = 174.81+/-8.29 cm, wt = 72.32+/-13.47 kg) and 14 ACLU subjects (age = 21.14+/-2.03 yr, ht = 177.35+/-11.31 cm, wt = 72.99+/-14.81 kg) participated. MEASUREMENTS: Hyperpronation was assessed via the navicular drop test and the calcaneal stance test. RESULTS: No significant difference (p > .05) between feet for the navicular drop test was found. However, there was a significant difference (p < .05) between feet for the calcaneal stance test, and, thus, this measure was not used in the regression analysis. Using the navicular drop score, the regression analysis was unable to predict group membership. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperpronation as measured by the navicular drop test was not a predictor of ACL injury, and, thus, may not be a predisposing factor to noncontact ACL injuries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hyperpronation and the occurrence of noncontact injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). DESIGN AND SETTING: Subjects were categorized as either ACL injured (ACLI) or ACL uninjured (ACLU). All ACLI subjects received their injuries from a noncontact mechanism. To justify using the ACLI subjects' uninjured legs as representative of their preinjury state, a t test was used to compare the differences between the left and right foot for the ACLU group on both measurements. Based on the results of the t test, a regression analysis was performed to determine whether group membership could be predicted from navicular drop. All measures were performed in a university athletic training room. SUBJECTS: Fourteen ACLI subjects (age = 21.07 +/- 0.83 yr, ht = 174.81+/-8.29 cm, wt = 72.32+/-13.47 kg) and 14 ACLU subjects (age = 21.14+/-2.03 yr, ht = 177.35+/-11.31 cm, wt = 72.99+/-14.81 kg) participated. MEASUREMENTS: Hyperpronation was assessed via the navicular drop test and the calcaneal stance test. RESULTS: No significant difference (p > .05) between feet for the navicular drop test was found. However, there was a significant difference (p < .05) between feet for the calcaneal stance test, and, thus, this measure was not used in the regression analysis. Using the navicular drop score, the regression analysis was unable to predict group membership. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperpronation as measured by the navicular drop test was not a predictor of ACL injury, and, thus, may not be a predisposing factor to noncontact ACL injuries.

Key concepts: Anterior cruciate ligament, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Medicine, ACL injury, Physical therapy, Test (biology), Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Risk factor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of hyperpronation as a possible risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. — Research Paper | ScholarLens