1995•Unpublished venueRequires access

Exceptions Are Strictly More Powerful Than Call/CC.

Mark Lillibridge

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Also appears as Fox Memorandum CMU-CS-FOX-95-03. We demonstrate that in the context of statically typed pure functional lambda calculi, exceptions are strictly more powerful than call/cc. More precisely, we prove that the simply typed lambda calculus extended with exceptions is strictly more powerful than Girard's F [6, 15] (a superset of the simply typed lambda calculus) extended with call/cc and abort. This result is established by showing that the rst language is Turing equivalent while the second language permits only a subset of the recursive functions to be written. We show that the simply typed lambda calculus extended with exceptions is Turing equivalent by reducing the untyped lambda calculus to it by means of a novel method for simulating recursive types using exception-returning functions. The result concerning F extended with call/cc is from a previous paper of the author and Robert

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Also appears as Fox Memorandum CMU-CS-FOX-95-03. We demonstrate that in the context of statically typed pure functional lambda calculi, exceptions are strictly more powerful than call/cc. More precisely, we prove that the simply typed lambda calculus extended with exceptions is strictly more powerful than Girard's F [6, 15] (a superset of the simply typed lambda calculus) extended with call/cc and abort. This result is established by showing that the rst language is Turing equivalent while the second language permits only a subset of the recursive functions to be written. We show that the simply typed lambda calculus extended with exceptions is Turing equivalent by reducing the untyped lambda calculus to it by means of a novel method for simulating recursive types using exception-returning functions. The result concerning F extended with call/cc is from a previous paper of the author and Robert

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Also appears as Fox Memorandum CMU-CS-FOX-95-03. We demonstrate that in the context of statically typed pure functional lambda calculi, exceptions are strictly more powerful than call/cc. More precisely, we prove that the simply typed lambda calculus extended with exceptions is strictly more powerful than Girard's F [6, 15] (a superset of the simply typed lambda calculus) extended with call/cc and abort. This result is established by showing that the rst language is Turing equivalent while the second language permits only a subset of the recursive functions to be written. We show that the simply typed lambda calculus extended with exceptions is Turing equivalent by reducing the untyped lambda calculus to it by means of a novel method for simulating recursive types using exception-returning functions. The result concerning F extended with call/cc is from a previous paper of the author and Robert

Key concepts: Computer science, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Exceptions Are Strictly More Powerful Than Call/CC. — Research Paper | ScholarLens