Deterritorialization in International Law: Moving Away from the Divide Between National and International Law
Catherine Brölmann
Abstract
Catherine Brölmann
Abstract
This chapter examines how the process of deterritorialization of international law, in which territoriality increasingly gives way to functionality as a dominant organizing principle, affects the relationship between international law and national law. It argues that alongside the territorially bound authority of the State, other normative regimes have come into existence. Although these may act out on state territory, they flow from an independent normative source and ultimately circumvent rather than ‘pierce’ the sovereign veil of the State.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter examines how the process of deterritorialization of international law, in which territoriality increasingly gives way to functionality as a dominant organizing principle, affects the relationship between international law and national law. It argues that alongside the territorially bound authority of the State, other normative regimes have come into existence. Although these may act out on state territory, they flow from an independent normative source and ultimately circumvent rather than ‘pierce’ the sovereign veil of the State.
Key concepts: Law, International law, Political science, Normative, Sovereignty, Municipal law, Comparative law, State (computer science)