2002PubMedRequires access

Restorative alternatives for the treatment of an impacted canine: surgical and prosthetic considerations.

Paolo Magheri, S. Cambi, R Grandini

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Impaction occurs more frequently with maxillary canines than with any other tooth except maxillary third molars. For functional and aesthetic purposes, impaction must be treated in a manner that facilitates recreation of the anatomical structures in the canine region. The general treatment of choice is surgical and orthodontic restoration of the impacted canine. When this protocol is impossible due to anatomical limitations or the patient's indications, alternative treatments are necessary. The authors introduce two case presentations in which impacted maxillary canine teeth were restored with alternatives to orthodontic therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Impaction occurs more frequently with maxillary canines than with any other tooth except maxillary third molars. For functional and aesthetic purposes, impaction must be treated in a manner that facilitates recreation of the anatomical structures in the canine region. The general treatment of choice is surgical and orthodontic restoration of the impacted canine. When this protocol is impossible due to anatomical limitations or the patient's indications, alternative treatments are necessary. The authors introduce two case presentations in which impacted maxillary canine teeth were restored with alternatives to orthodontic therapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Impaction occurs more frequently with maxillary canines than with any other tooth except maxillary third molars. For functional and aesthetic purposes, impaction must be treated in a manner that facilitates recreation of the anatomical structures in the canine region. The general treatment of choice is surgical and orthodontic restoration of the impacted canine. When this protocol is impossible due to anatomical limitations or the patient's indications, alternative treatments are necessary. The authors introduce two case presentations in which impacted maxillary canine teeth were restored with alternatives to orthodontic therapy.

Key concepts: Impaction, Maxillary canine, Medicine, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Impacted tooth, Molar, Restorative dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Restorative alternatives for the treatment of an impacted canine: surgical and prosthetic considerations. — Research Paper | ScholarLens