Restorative alternatives for the treatment of an impacted canine: surgical and prosthetic considerations.
Paolo Magheri, S. Cambi, R Grandini
Abstract
Paolo Magheri, S. Cambi, R Grandini
Abstract
Impaction occurs more frequently with maxillary canines than with any other tooth except maxillary third molars. For functional and aesthetic purposes, impaction must be treated in a manner that facilitates recreation of the anatomical structures in the canine region. The general treatment of choice is surgical and orthodontic restoration of the impacted canine. When this protocol is impossible due to anatomical limitations or the patient's indications, alternative treatments are necessary. The authors introduce two case presentations in which impacted maxillary canine teeth were restored with alternatives to orthodontic therapy.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Impaction occurs more frequently with maxillary canines than with any other tooth except maxillary third molars. For functional and aesthetic purposes, impaction must be treated in a manner that facilitates recreation of the anatomical structures in the canine region. The general treatment of choice is surgical and orthodontic restoration of the impacted canine. When this protocol is impossible due to anatomical limitations or the patient's indications, alternative treatments are necessary. The authors introduce two case presentations in which impacted maxillary canine teeth were restored with alternatives to orthodontic therapy.
Key concepts: Impaction, Maxillary canine, Medicine, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Impacted tooth, Molar, Restorative dentistry