Ideal Speech and Feminist Discourse:
Nancy S. Love
Abstract
Nancy S. Love
Abstract
Modern or postmodern? This debate which has long raged among political theorists now plays a central role in feminist theory. Although traditional theorists typically choose a side, feminist theorists often split the difference. Since feminist struggles require unity and diversity, they construct and deconstruct "Woman" to suit "Her" purposes. This strategy raises the political questions: Who decides who "we" are? How should that decision be made? In this article, I argue that Haberma's ideal speech situation re-visioned as "solidarity-in-progress" helps answer those questions. It provides a discourse for feminist theorists.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Modern or postmodern? This debate which has long raged among political theorists now plays a central role in feminist theory. Although traditional theorists typically choose a side, feminist theorists often split the difference. Since feminist struggles require unity and diversity, they construct and deconstruct "Woman" to suit "Her" purposes. This strategy raises the political questions: Who decides who "we" are? How should that decision be made? In this article, I argue that Haberma's ideal speech situation re-visioned as "solidarity-in-progress" helps answer those questions. It provides a discourse for feminist theorists.
Key concepts: Ideal (ethics), Solidarity, Sociology, Construct (python library), Postmodernism, Politics, Feminist philosophy, Epistemology