1991Journal of Women Politics & PolicyRequires access

Ideal Speech and Feminist Discourse:

Nancy S. Love

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Modern or postmodern? This debate which has long raged among political theorists now plays a central role in feminist theory. Although traditional theorists typically choose a side, feminist theorists often split the difference. Since feminist struggles require unity and diversity, they construct and deconstruct "Woman" to suit "Her" purposes. This strategy raises the political questions: Who decides who "we" are? How should that decision be made? In this article, I argue that Haberma's ideal speech situation re-visioned as "solidarity-in-progress" helps answer those questions. It provides a discourse for feminist theorists.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Modern or postmodern? This debate which has long raged among political theorists now plays a central role in feminist theory. Although traditional theorists typically choose a side, feminist theorists often split the difference. Since feminist struggles require unity and diversity, they construct and deconstruct "Woman" to suit "Her" purposes. This strategy raises the political questions: Who decides who "we" are? How should that decision be made? In this article, I argue that Haberma's ideal speech situation re-visioned as "solidarity-in-progress" helps answer those questions. It provides a discourse for feminist theorists.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Modern or postmodern? This debate which has long raged among political theorists now plays a central role in feminist theory. Although traditional theorists typically choose a side, feminist theorists often split the difference. Since feminist struggles require unity and diversity, they construct and deconstruct "Woman" to suit "Her" purposes. This strategy raises the political questions: Who decides who "we" are? How should that decision be made? In this article, I argue that Haberma's ideal speech situation re-visioned as "solidarity-in-progress" helps answer those questions. It provides a discourse for feminist theorists.

Key concepts: Ideal (ethics), Solidarity, Sociology, Construct (python library), Postmodernism, Politics, Feminist philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ideal Speech and Feminist Discourse: — Research Paper | ScholarLens