1999American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsOpen access

Managing the Risk of European Corn Borer Resistance of Transgenic Corn: An Assessment of Refuge Recommendations

Terrance M. Hurley, Silvia Secchi, Bruce A. Babcock, Richard L. Hellmich, Hurley, Terrance M., Secchi, Silvia, Babcock, Bruce A., Hellmich, Richard L.

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Industry and scientists have worked to develop a high-dose refuge management plan that can effectively delay European corn borer (ECB) resistance to new genetically modified pesticidal corn. For a high dose, the corn expresses enough pesticide to kill all but the most resistant corn borers. For refuge, producers plant a traditional corn variety that allows susceptible corn borers to thrive and mate with resistant corn borers, slowing the proliferation of resistance. In general, the more refuge that is planted the less likely resistance. While there is general agreement on the basic premise of the high-dose refuge plan, how much refuge is needed to manage resistance is still being debated. This paper develops a stochastic agricultural production model to assess and provide insight into the reasons why refuge recommendations remain controversial. We find that (a) reducing the risk of resistance requires decreasing agricultural productivity, (b) new technologies that are currently being tested will reduce the risk of resistance, (c) producer noncompliance increases the risk of resistance, and (d) nonrandom mating in the ECB populations increases the risk of resistance. Disagreements over the importance of nonrandom mating and producer compliance can be resolved with additional research. Controversy will remain, however, as long as producers and industry continue to bear most of the financial cost of reducing the risk of resistance through higher refuge recommendations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Industry and scientists have worked to develop a high-dose refuge management plan that can effectively delay European corn borer (ECB) resistance to new genetically modified pesticidal corn. For a high dose, the corn expresses enough pesticide to kill all but the most resistant corn borers. For refuge, producers plant a traditional corn variety that allows susceptible corn borers to thrive and mate with resistant corn borers, slowing the proliferation of resistance. In general, the more refuge that is planted the less likely resistance. While there is general agreement on the basic premise of the high-dose refuge plan, how much refuge is needed to manage resistance is still being debated. This paper develops a stochastic agricultural production model to assess and provide insight into the reasons why refuge recommendations remain controversial. We find that (a) reducing the risk of resistance requires decreasing agricultural productivity, (b) new technologies that are currently being tested will reduce the risk of resistance, (c) producer noncompliance increases the risk of resistance, and (d) nonrandom mating in the ECB populations increases the risk of resistance. Disagreements over the importance of nonrandom mating and producer compliance can be resolved with additional research. Controversy will remain, however, as long as producers and industry continue to bear most of the financial cost of reducing the risk of resistance through higher refuge recommendations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Industry and scientists have worked to develop a high-dose refuge management plan that can effectively delay European corn borer (ECB) resistance to new genetically modified pesticidal corn. For a high dose, the corn expresses enough pesticide to kill all but the most resistant corn borers. For refuge, producers plant a traditional corn variety that allows susceptible corn borers to thrive and mate with resistant corn borers, slowing the proliferation of resistance. In general, the more refuge that is planted the less likely resistance. While there is general agreement on the basic premise of the high-dose refuge plan, how much refuge is needed to manage resistance is still being debated. This paper develops a stochastic agricultural production model to assess and provide insight into the reasons why refuge recommendations remain controversial. We find that (a) reducing the risk of resistance requires decreasing agricultural productivity, (b) new technologies that are currently being tested will reduce the risk of resistance, (c) producer noncompliance increases the risk of resistance, and (d) nonrandom mating in the ECB populations increases the risk of resistance. Disagreements over the importance of nonrandom mating and producer compliance can be resolved with additional research. Controversy will remain, however, as long as producers and industry continue to bear most of the financial cost of reducing the risk of resistance through higher refuge recommendations.

Key concepts: Genetically modified maize, European corn borer, Genetically modified crops, Resistance (ecology), Agriculture, Genetically modified organism, Zea mays, Production (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Managing the Risk of European Corn Borer Resistance of Transgenic Corn: An Assessment of Refuge Recommendations — Research Paper | ScholarLens