1995•SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesRequires access

Human Volunteer Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion: A New Analysis

J. Thunnissen, Jac S. H. M. Wismans, Channing L. Ewing, Daniel J. Thomas

Open publisher page 115 citations

Abstract

At the Naval BioDynamics Laboratory (NBDL) in New Orleans a large series of human volunteer experiments has been conducted by Ewing and Thomas [1]* to determine the dynamic head-neck response. From a number of these experiments Wismans et al. [2] determined omni-directional dummy head-neck performance requirements relative to a non-rotated T1 coordinate system (i.e. the head motions incorporate the influence of the thoracic column flexibility). In 1987, the frontal volunteer head-neck response was compared with the response of postmortem human subject (PMHS) experiments [3]. One of the findings was that the volunteer T1 rotations differ significantly from the PMHS T1 rotations which was explained by measurement “errors” in the T1 instrumentation. The present paper is an extension of the previous work [2,3]. A detailed analysis of the high-speed films revealed that the volunteer T1 instrumentation mount was not firmly mounted to the spine. In the present analysis a T1 correction is applied to the experiments used in the previous analyses. A description of the correction methodology will be presented. The objective of the present study is to correct for the errors in the T1 rotations and to develop a set of new performance requirements which are expressed relative to a rotated T1 coordinate system. New requirements will be presented and compared with previous analyses. Additionally, the dynamic response of the Hybrid III dummy neck will be evaluated on the basis of the new performance requirements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

At the Naval BioDynamics Laboratory (NBDL) in New Orleans a large series of human volunteer experiments has been conducted by Ewing and Thomas [1]* to determine the dynamic head-neck response. From a number of these experiments Wismans et al. [2] determined omni-directional dummy head-neck performance requirements relative to a non-rotated T1 coordinate system (i.e. the head motions incorporate the influence of the thoracic column flexibility). In 1987, the frontal volunteer head-neck response was compared with the response of postmortem human subject (PMHS) experiments [3]. One of the findings was that the volunteer T1 rotations differ significantly from the PMHS T1 rotations which was explained by measurement “errors” in the T1 instrumentation. The present paper is an extension of the previous work [2,3]. A detailed analysis of the high-speed films revealed that the volunteer T1 instrumentation mount was not firmly mounted to the spine. In the present analysis a T1 correction is applied to the experiments used in the previous analyses. A description of the correction methodology will be presented. The objective of the present study is to correct for the errors in the T1 rotations and to develop a set of new performance requirements which are expressed relative to a rotated T1 coordinate system. New requirements will be presented and compared with previous analyses. Additionally, the dynamic response of the Hybrid III dummy neck will be evaluated on the basis of the new performance requirements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 115 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

At the Naval BioDynamics Laboratory (NBDL) in New Orleans a large series of human volunteer experiments has been conducted by Ewing and Thomas [1]* to determine the dynamic head-neck response. From a number of these experiments Wismans et al. [2] determined omni-directional dummy head-neck performance requirements relative to a non-rotated T1 coordinate system (i.e. the head motions incorporate the influence of the thoracic column flexibility). In 1987, the frontal volunteer head-neck response was compared with the response of postmortem human subject (PMHS) experiments [3]. One of the findings was that the volunteer T1 rotations differ significantly from the PMHS T1 rotations which was explained by measurement “errors” in the T1 instrumentation. The present paper is an extension of the previous work [2,3]. A detailed analysis of the high-speed films revealed that the volunteer T1 instrumentation mount was not firmly mounted to the spine. In the present analysis a T1 correction is applied to the experiments used in the previous analyses. A description of the correction methodology will be presented. The objective of the present study is to correct for the errors in the T1 rotations and to develop a set of new performance requirements which are expressed relative to a rotated T1 coordinate system. New requirements will be presented and compared with previous analyses. Additionally, the dynamic response of the Hybrid III dummy neck will be evaluated on the basis of the new performance requirements.

Key concepts: Head (geology), Computer science, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Volunteer, Head and neck, Medicine, Geology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Human Volunteer Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion: A New Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens