2002Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Cohabitation and marriage

Antony W. Dnes

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

Introduction Simple cohabitation occurs when a man and woman live together as though married but without completing any recognized marriage ceremony or meeting the requirements for common law marriage, where this exists. This least formal relationship has been growing in significance over recent decades. Such a quasi-married state carries fewer of the legal obligations that characterize marriage. In England there has been no legal recognition of common law marriage since an Act of Parliament of 1753. Among other things, this implies that one, home-owning, cohabiting party could eject another from a shared home without there being any claim on its value or services, although this position is currently under review by the Law Commission. In other countries, for example in some American states and in continental Europe, greater legal recognition of cohabitation is nonetheless usually limited compared with marriage. Where US states have recognized cohabitation contracts (for example, awarding “palimony” upon separation) as in Marvin v. Marvin (1976), they have done so under contract rather than family law. Several questions are of great interest. Why would some men and women deliberately seek a set of lesser obligations towards each other? Is the trend towards cohabitation in some sense therefore supportive of the welfare of these couples? In that case, the trend might be judged to be efficient. Alternatively, are there barriers to marriage that could be removed to everybody's benefit? Finally, what is an appropriate response for the state, given the growth in cohabitation?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Simple cohabitation occurs when a man and woman live together as though married but without completing any recognized marriage ceremony or meeting the requirements for common law marriage, where this exists. This least formal relationship has been growing in significance over recent decades. Such a quasi-married state carries fewer of the legal obligations that characterize marriage. In England there has been no legal recognition of common law marriage since an Act of Parliament of 1753. Among other things, this implies that one, home-owning, cohabiting party could eject another from a shared home without there being any claim on its value or services, although this position is currently under review by the Law Commission. In other countries, for example in some American states and in continental Europe, greater legal recognition of cohabitation is nonetheless usually limited compared with marriage. Where US states have recognized cohabitation contracts (for example, awarding “palimony” upon separation) as in Marvin v. Marvin (1976), they have done so under contract rather than family law. Several questions are of great interest. Why would some men and women deliberately seek a set of lesser obligations towards each other? Is the trend towards cohabitation in some sense therefore supportive of the welfare of these couples? In that case, the trend might be judged to be efficient. Alternatively, are there barriers to marriage that could be removed to everybody's benefit? Finally, what is an appropriate response for the state, given the growth in cohabitation?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Simple cohabitation occurs when a man and woman live together as though married but without completing any recognized marriage ceremony or meeting the requirements for common law marriage, where this exists. This least formal relationship has been growing in significance over recent decades. Such a quasi-married state carries fewer of the legal obligations that characterize marriage. In England there has been no legal recognition of common law marriage since an Act of Parliament of 1753. Among other things, this implies that one, home-owning, cohabiting party could eject another from a shared home without there being any claim on its value or services, although this position is currently under review by the Law Commission. In other countries, for example in some American states and in continental Europe, greater legal recognition of cohabitation is nonetheless usually limited compared with marriage. Where US states have recognized cohabitation contracts (for example, awarding “palimony” upon separation) as in Marvin v. Marvin (1976), they have done so under contract rather than family law. Several questions are of great interest. Why would some men and women deliberately seek a set of lesser obligations towards each other? Is the trend towards cohabitation in some sense therefore supportive of the welfare of these couples? In that case, the trend might be judged to be efficient. Alternatively, are there barriers to marriage that could be removed to everybody's benefit? Finally, what is an appropriate response for the state, given the growth in cohabitation?

Key concepts: Cohabitation, Parliament, Family law, Law, Marriage law, Ceremony, Political science, Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cohabitation and marriage — Research Paper | ScholarLens