2013•Magnetic Resonance in MedicineOpen access

Quantitative cerebral blood flow with bolus tracking perfusion MRI: Measurements in porcine model and comparison with PET

Elias Kellner, Michael D. Mix, Marco Reisert, Katharina Förster, Thanh Thao Nguyen, Daniel Splitthoff, Peter Gall, Valerij G. Kiselev, Irina Mader

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: We recently presented a method for the quantitative measurement of the arterial input function which allows for determination of absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF) values without adjustable parameters. The aim of the present work is to estimate absolute CBF values by using this new technique and to compare it with the gold standard for cerebral perfusion, H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography. METHODS: Pigs (13) were comparatively investigated by each method performing multiple measurement runs. The reproducibility of both methods was assessed by a voxel-wise correlation of repeated measurements. An intersubject evaluation was performed on median whole-brain CBF estimates. RESULTS: The mean CBF (MRI) was 20±4mL/100g/min for gray matter, the mean CBF (positron emission tomography) was 24±6mL/100g/min for gray and white matter. The reproducibility for MRI correlated with r = 0.85 and P<0.0001, for positron emission tomography with r = 0.76 and P<0.0001. The correlation for the median whole-brain CBF in MRI and positron emission tomography was r = 0.60 and P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method allows for determination of quantitative CBF without normalization factors. The relatively low estimates of absolute CBF most likely results from the higher age of the pigs as compared to other studies. The intermediate correlation between both methods is caused by physiological intraindividual fluctuations of the CBF and by a limited reproducibility of both methods.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: We recently presented a method for the quantitative measurement of the arterial input function which allows for determination of absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF) values without adjustable parameters. The aim of the present work is to estimate absolute CBF values by using this new technique and to compare it with the gold standard for cerebral perfusion, H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography. METHODS: Pigs (13) were comparatively investigated by each method performing multiple measurement runs. The reproducibility of both methods was assessed by a voxel-wise correlation of repeated measurements. An intersubject evaluation was performed on median whole-brain CBF estimates. RESULTS: The mean CBF (MRI) was 20±4mL/100g/min for gray matter, the mean CBF (positron emission tomography) was 24±6mL/100g/min for gray and white matter. The reproducibility for MRI correlated with r = 0.85 and P<0.0001, for positron emission tomography with r = 0.76 and P<0.0001. The correlation for the median whole-brain CBF in MRI and positron emission tomography was r = 0.60 and P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method allows for determination of quantitative CBF without normalization factors. The relatively low estimates of absolute CBF most likely results from the higher age of the pigs as compared to other studies. The intermediate correlation between both methods is caused by physiological intraindividual fluctuations of the CBF and by a limited reproducibility of both methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: We recently presented a method for the quantitative measurement of the arterial input function which allows for determination of absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF) values without adjustable parameters. The aim of the present work is to estimate absolute CBF values by using this new technique and to compare it with the gold standard for cerebral perfusion, H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography. METHODS: Pigs (13) were comparatively investigated by each method performing multiple measurement runs. The reproducibility of both methods was assessed by a voxel-wise correlation of repeated measurements. An intersubject evaluation was performed on median whole-brain CBF estimates. RESULTS: The mean CBF (MRI) was 20±4mL/100g/min for gray matter, the mean CBF (positron emission tomography) was 24±6mL/100g/min for gray and white matter. The reproducibility for MRI correlated with r = 0.85 and P<0.0001, for positron emission tomography with r = 0.76 and P<0.0001. The correlation for the median whole-brain CBF in MRI and positron emission tomography was r = 0.60 and P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method allows for determination of quantitative CBF without normalization factors. The relatively low estimates of absolute CBF most likely results from the higher age of the pigs as compared to other studies. The intermediate correlation between both methods is caused by physiological intraindividual fluctuations of the CBF and by a limited reproducibility of both methods.

Key concepts: Reproducibility, Cerebral blood flow, Positron emission tomography, Nuclear medicine, Medicine, White matter, Perfusion, Perfusion scanning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantitative cerebral blood flow with bolus tracking perfusion MRI: Measurements in porcine model and comparison with PET — Research Paper | ScholarLens