1999World Journal of GastroenterologyOpen access

Protective effect of Irsogladine on monochloramine induced gastric mucosal lesions in rats: a comparative study with rebamipide

Hedeichiro Yamamoto

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

AIM:To examine the effect of irsogladine, a novel antiulcer drug, on the mucosal ulcerogenic response to monochloramine (NH(2)Cl) in rat stomach, in comparison with rebamipide, another antiulcer drug with cytoprotective a ctivity.METHODS AND RESULTS:Oral administration of NH(2)Cl-(120mM) produced severe hemorrhagic lesions in unanesthetized rat stomachs.Both irsogladine (1mg/kg-10mg/ kg,po) and rebamipide (30mg/kg-100mg/kg, po) dose dependently prevented the development of these lesions in response to NH(2)Cl, the effect of irsogladine was significant at 3mg/kg or greater, and that of rebamipide only at 100mg/kg. The protective effect of irsogladine on NH(2)Cl induced gastric lesions was significantly reduced by N( G) nitro L arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) but not by indomethacin, while that of rebamipide was significantly mitigated by indomethacin but not by L-NAME. Topical application of NH(2)Cl-(20mM)caused a marked reduction of potential difference (PD) in exvivo stomachs. This PD reduction was not affected by mucosal application of irso-gladine, but significantly prevented by rebamipide. The mucosal exposure to NH(4)OH (120mM) also caused a marked PD reduction in the ischemic stomach (bleeding from the carotid artery), resulting in gastric lesions. These ulcerogenic and PD responses caused by NH(4)OH plus ischemia were also significantly mitigated by rebamipide, in an indomethacin sensitive manner, while irsogladine potently prevented such lesions without affecting the PD response, in a L-NAME sensitive manner.CONCLUSION:These results suggest that (1)NH(2)Cl gen-erated either exogenously or endogenously damages the gastric mucosa, (2)both irsogladine and rebamipide protect the stomach against injury caused by NH(2)Cl,and (3)the mechanism underlying the protective action of irsogladine is partly mediated by endogenous nitric oxide, while that of rebamipide is in part mediated by endogenous prostaglandins.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM:To examine the effect of irsogladine, a novel antiulcer drug, on the mucosal ulcerogenic response to monochloramine (NH(2)Cl) in rat stomach, in comparison with rebamipide, another antiulcer drug with cytoprotective a ctivity.METHODS AND RESULTS:Oral administration of NH(2)Cl-(120mM) produced severe hemorrhagic lesions in unanesthetized rat stomachs.Both irsogladine (1mg/kg-10mg/ kg,po) and rebamipide (30mg/kg-100mg/kg, po) dose dependently prevented the development of these lesions in response to NH(2)Cl, the effect of irsogladine was significant at 3mg/kg or greater, and that of rebamipide only at 100mg/kg. The protective effect of irsogladine on NH(2)Cl induced gastric lesions was significantly reduced by N( G) nitro L arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) but not by indomethacin, while that of rebamipide was significantly mitigated by indomethacin but not by L-NAME. Topical application of NH(2)Cl-(20mM)caused a marked reduction of potential difference (PD) in exvivo stomachs. This PD reduction was not affected by mucosal application of irso-gladine, but significantly prevented by rebamipide. The mucosal exposure to NH(4)OH (120mM) also caused a marked PD reduction in the ischemic stomach (bleeding from the carotid artery), resulting in gastric lesions. These ulcerogenic and PD responses caused by NH(4)OH plus ischemia were also significantly mitigated by rebamipide, in an indomethacin sensitive manner, while irsogladine potently prevented such lesions without affecting the PD response, in a L-NAME sensitive manner.CONCLUSION:These results suggest that (1)NH(2)Cl gen-erated either exogenously or endogenously damages the gastric mucosa, (2)both irsogladine and rebamipide protect the stomach against injury caused by NH(2)Cl,and (3)the mechanism underlying the protective action of irsogladine is partly mediated by endogenous nitric oxide, while that of rebamipide is in part mediated by endogenous prostaglandins.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM:To examine the effect of irsogladine, a novel antiulcer drug, on the mucosal ulcerogenic response to monochloramine (NH(2)Cl) in rat stomach, in comparison with rebamipide, another antiulcer drug with cytoprotective a ctivity.METHODS AND RESULTS:Oral administration of NH(2)Cl-(120mM) produced severe hemorrhagic lesions in unanesthetized rat stomachs.Both irsogladine (1mg/kg-10mg/ kg,po) and rebamipide (30mg/kg-100mg/kg, po) dose dependently prevented the development of these lesions in response to NH(2)Cl, the effect of irsogladine was significant at 3mg/kg or greater, and that of rebamipide only at 100mg/kg. The protective effect of irsogladine on NH(2)Cl induced gastric lesions was significantly reduced by N( G) nitro L arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) but not by indomethacin, while that of rebamipide was significantly mitigated by indomethacin but not by L-NAME. Topical application of NH(2)Cl-(20mM)caused a marked reduction of potential difference (PD) in exvivo stomachs. This PD reduction was not affected by mucosal application of irso-gladine, but significantly prevented by rebamipide. The mucosal exposure to NH(4)OH (120mM) also caused a marked PD reduction in the ischemic stomach (bleeding from the carotid artery), resulting in gastric lesions. These ulcerogenic and PD responses caused by NH(4)OH plus ischemia were also significantly mitigated by rebamipide, in an indomethacin sensitive manner, while irsogladine potently prevented such lesions without affecting the PD response, in a L-NAME sensitive manner.CONCLUSION:These results suggest that (1)NH(2)Cl gen-erated either exogenously or endogenously damages the gastric mucosa, (2)both irsogladine and rebamipide protect the stomach against injury caused by NH(2)Cl,and (3)the mechanism underlying the protective action of irsogladine is partly mediated by endogenous nitric oxide, while that of rebamipide is in part mediated by endogenous prostaglandins.

Key concepts: Rebamipide, Antiulcer drug, Gastroenterology, Stomach, Pharmacology, Chemistry, Internal medicine, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protective effect of Irsogladine on monochloramine induced gastric mucosal lesions in rats: a comparative study with rebamipide — Research Paper | ScholarLens