2003•Bond Law ReviewOpen access

The Shifting Meaning of Persecution in Australian Refugee Law: How Much Must One Suffer to be Deserving of Asylum?

Penny Dimopoulos, Mirko Bagaric

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This article examines legislative changes to the meaning of persecution in Australia in the context of refugee law.In particular it considers the level of harm that a person must endure to be eligible for refugee status.The reflexive humanitarian response is that even relatively low levels of harassment and discrimination should suffice.However, it is argued that this approach is flawed.Given the limited number of refugees that states are prepared to accept, a narrow definition of persecution should be adopted, such that only asylum seekers whose subsistence is imperiled should qualify as refugees.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines legislative changes to the meaning of persecution in Australia in the context of refugee law.In particular it considers the level of harm that a person must endure to be eligible for refugee status.The reflexive humanitarian response is that even relatively low levels of harassment and discrimination should suffice.However, it is argued that this approach is flawed.Given the limited number of refugees that states are prepared to accept, a narrow definition of persecution should be adopted, such that only asylum seekers whose subsistence is imperiled should qualify as refugees.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines legislative changes to the meaning of persecution in Australia in the context of refugee law.In particular it considers the level of harm that a person must endure to be eligible for refugee status.The reflexive humanitarian response is that even relatively low levels of harassment and discrimination should suffice.However, it is argued that this approach is flawed.Given the limited number of refugees that states are prepared to accept, a narrow definition of persecution should be adopted, such that only asylum seekers whose subsistence is imperiled should qualify as refugees.

Key concepts: Persecution, Refugee, Meaning (existential), Law, Refugee law, Political science, Torture, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Shifting Meaning of Persecution in Australian Refugee Law: How Much Must One Suffer to be Deserving of Asylum? — Research Paper | ScholarLens