2009RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Subscription Equilibrium with Production: Neutrality and Constrained Suboptimality of Equilibria*

Ünal Zenginobuz, Antonio Villanacci

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We revisit the analysis of subscription equilibria in a full fledged general equilibrium model with public goods. We study the case of a non-profit, or public, firm that produces the public good using private goods as inputs, which are to be financed by voluntary contributions of households. We analyze policy interventions that will lead to an increase of the public good level at subscription equilibria, and show that most of the standard neutrality results do not survive in our general equilibrium model with many private goods and relative price effects allowed. We also take a direct approach to welfare analysis and study interventions that has the goal of Pareto improving upon subscription equilibrium outcomes. We delineate conditions under which, for a generic set of economies, well chosen interventions will Pareto improve upon a given subscription equilibrium outcome. In particular, we show that a general non-neutrality result in terms of utilities holds even if all households are contributors. ∗We would like to thank Steve Matthews for very helpful comments. Unal Zenginobuz acknowledges partial support from Bogazici University Research Fund, Project No: 05C101. †Department of Mathematics for Decision Theory (Di.Ma.D.), University of Florence, via Lombroso 6/17, 50134 Firenze, Italy; e-mail: antonio.villanacci@unifi.it. ‡Department of Economics and Center for Economic Design, Bogazici University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey; e-mail: zenginob@boun.edu.tr.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We revisit the analysis of subscription equilibria in a full fledged general equilibrium model with public goods. We study the case of a non-profit, or public, firm that produces the public good using private goods as inputs, which are to be financed by voluntary contributions of households. We analyze policy interventions that will lead to an increase of the public good level at subscription equilibria, and show that most of the standard neutrality results do not survive in our general equilibrium model with many private goods and relative price effects allowed. We also take a direct approach to welfare analysis and study interventions that has the goal of Pareto improving upon subscription equilibrium outcomes. We delineate conditions under which, for a generic set of economies, well chosen interventions will Pareto improve upon a given subscription equilibrium outcome. In particular, we show that a general non-neutrality result in terms of utilities holds even if all households are contributors. ∗We would like to thank Steve Matthews for very helpful comments. Unal Zenginobuz acknowledges partial support from Bogazici University Research Fund, Project No: 05C101. †Department of Mathematics for Decision Theory (Di.Ma.D.), University of Florence, via Lombroso 6/17, 50134 Firenze, Italy; e-mail: antonio.villanacci@unifi.it. ‡Department of Economics and Center for Economic Design, Bogazici University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey; e-mail: zenginob@boun.edu.tr.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We revisit the analysis of subscription equilibria in a full fledged general equilibrium model with public goods. We study the case of a non-profit, or public, firm that produces the public good using private goods as inputs, which are to be financed by voluntary contributions of households. We analyze policy interventions that will lead to an increase of the public good level at subscription equilibria, and show that most of the standard neutrality results do not survive in our general equilibrium model with many private goods and relative price effects allowed. We also take a direct approach to welfare analysis and study interventions that has the goal of Pareto improving upon subscription equilibrium outcomes. We delineate conditions under which, for a generic set of economies, well chosen interventions will Pareto improve upon a given subscription equilibrium outcome. In particular, we show that a general non-neutrality result in terms of utilities holds even if all households are contributors. ∗We would like to thank Steve Matthews for very helpful comments. Unal Zenginobuz acknowledges partial support from Bogazici University Research Fund, Project No: 05C101. †Department of Mathematics for Decision Theory (Di.Ma.D.), University of Florence, via Lombroso 6/17, 50134 Firenze, Italy; e-mail: antonio.villanacci@unifi.it. ‡Department of Economics and Center for Economic Design, Bogazici University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey; e-mail: zenginob@boun.edu.tr.

Key concepts: Neutrality, General equilibrium theory, Economics, Public good, Pareto principle, Welfare, Production (economics), Psychological intervention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Subscription Equilibrium with Production: Neutrality and Constrained Suboptimality of Equilibria* — Research Paper | ScholarLens